Economic cost of cancer
Good news for taxpayers, cancer patients and science!
The following is an account of what occurred at the 2017 IEEE-NSS-MIC-RTSD Conference, in Atlanta, Georgia, after I distributed 1,200 copies of the 4-page article published by Focus Daily News on Sunday, October 22, 2017 available in pdf at: goo.gl/EJD9yU and in HTML at http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2156. The General Chairman of the 2017 IEEE-NSS-MIC-RTSD Conference, Dr. John Aarsvold, after reading the seventeen-year history of adversities and difficulties I have had to receive scientific answers to my articles and proposals submitted to anonymous reviewers to be presented at IEEE conferences, and to publish and fund my inventions, agreed on the need for an exceptional, major public scientific review of my revolutionary breakthrough inventions that would go beyond the regular anonymous review process of an article or funding of a proposal. He agreed it should be a similar format to the major, public, scientific review of my previous invention that was requested by the Director of the Superconducting Super Collider (also Director of Fermilab), and held on December 1993 at FERMIlab and recognized as valuable. Continue reading
Facts and figures in the article prove that there are no technical or economic reasons to prevent the defeat of cancer and to reduce the cost of experiments in High Energy Physics Continue reading
This document is available in pdf at: goo.gl/EJD9yU
BY JOSHUA C. JOHNSON. Focus Daily News
October 22, 2017 – Some would argue that DeSoto scientist Dario Crosetto is the Ignaz Semmelweis of our time. Many of us born after the 19th Century don’t know who Semmelweis is, although we owe our lives to his unconventional efforts.
In 1845, the German-Hungarian physician was among the first to pioneer the extensive use of antiseptic procedures before childbirth. Later noted as the “savior of mothers”, the measure curbed the mortality of deaths during delivery by 30 percent. But before millions of lives were saved, Semmelweis was ostracized, arrested and finally committed to a mental institution for standing up for his beliefs.
Taking A Stand Today
Fast forward 172 years into the future and Scientist Dario Crosetto, 65, is making a stand on another medical marvel that could save millions more lives. After years of research, Crosetto has developed a medical imaging device that is hundreds of times more efficient at identifying cancerous cells than anything currently on the market. Continue reading
This document is available in pdf at: goo.gl/FdAGvu
Consumer Protection – A Google Search of “Cancer Breakthrough” returns 50 million hits in 0.65 seconds. How can consumers, investors or philanthropists who care about reducing cancer deaths find the highest return from 50 million hits? Continue reading
This document is available in pdf at: goo.gl/4vEEW6
Cancer will continue to kill 8.2 million people per year expected to reach 13 million in 20 years at a cost of $1500 billion per year OR The 3D-CBS can save 2 million lives per year (Table cell D58) at $350 billion per year (Table cell G58 at goo.gl/BnrUdc). Continue reading
This document is available in pdf at: goo.gl/bTDJ81
Dear Senator McCain and all cancer patients, I have been working long days for over 18 years without a salary, including most weekends for the benefit of cancer patients like you and for the future generations in reducing cancer deaths by over 50% with my breakthrough technology for an effective early cancer detection. Many people like you would enormously increase their survival rate if they will be able to make sure that all cancerous tissue has been removed with surgery, radiation therapy or chemotherapy, as well as with an effective early cancer detection, with my 3D-CBS (3-D Complete Body Screening) hundreds of times more efficient and requiring 1% the radiation compared to the current over 10,000 PET (Positron Emission Tomography) devices used in hospitals. Continue reading
This document is available in pdf at: goo.gl/hnPCeK
I have invented a revolutionary electronic technology-independent architecture/instrument proven feasible by 59 quotes from reputable industries to build using 2015 technology a 3D-Flow OPRA (Object Pattern real-time Recognition Algorithms) system with 8,192 channels, in 36 cm (15 inch) cube of electronics capable of sustaining over 1.3TB/sec input data rate, and execute with zero dead-time on the input data, complex programmable real-time Object Pattern Recognition Algorithms (OPRA) at a production cost of approximately $100,000. In the same volume of 36 cm cube of electronics, it is feasible to build a 3D-Flow OPRA system with 20,000 channels capable of sustaining over 20TB/sec input data rate. Larger systems can be built by linking several similar cubes of electronics. Continue reading
This document in English is available in pdf at: goo.gl/iEph5R
This document in Italian is available in pdf at: goo.gl/qp1RFH
The entire list of documents is at: goo.gl/XtMkJc.
Response to statements made by Dr. Nadia Pastrone, President of the Italian National Scientific Committee 1 (CSN1) and responsible for the Italian physicists who worked at the CERN, regarding my 3D-Flow OPRA and a request to follow scientific procedures complying with rules respecting science, colleagues and serving taxpayers. Continue reading
This document in English is available in pdf at: goo.gl/dYGusD
My 3D-Flow OPRA (Object Pattern real-time Recognition Algorithms) invention could have already saved hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars and my 3D-CBS (3-D Complete Body Screening) invention which makes use of the 3D-Flow OPRA, could have already saved millions of lives with an effective early cancer detection (See below supported claims). Continue reading
Dear Dr. Michael Corbat, CEO of Citigroup, Dear Dr. James Forese, President of Citigroup, Dear members of the Board of Directors and the Executive board of Citigroup, Dear decision makers, leaders in the field, investigative journalists and those who care to make the scientific truth for the benefit of humanity prevail, we should work together to demand and implement transparency in science (please see APPEDIX for references to information supporting these claims). What is needed is to address the real problem that influential scientists handling taxpayer money have the responsibility to make the scientific truth emerge through transparent, public, scientific reviews, rather than wasting taxpayer money. Continue reading