The Future is in Our Hands
Blog
Information, Awareness, Prevention / United to End Cancer

FLAWS at CERN

This document is available in PDF at Google Drive goo.gl/hea4EC

Dear Dr. Cherry Murray, Benjamin Peirce Professor of Technology and Public Policy at Harvard SEAS, former Director of the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).

                  I respectfully request you address the proof that my invention, proven feasible by 59 quotes from reputable industries, can replace 4,000 CMS electronic data processing boards (goo.gl/mPHw5Y) funded by DOE with my 9 electronic data processing boards (goo.gl/OTkH4z) while providing an enormous performance improvement at one thousandth the cost. Continue reading

Share it!Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on TumblrEmail this to someone

See the PDF of this document at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxWfo2ViJ6r5c25sYmh1SnJTa00/view?usp=sharing.  Dear Joel Butler, Thank you for your response and for your question.

My goal is to help you and CERN build the most powerful tools to uncover the unknown, beyond the imagination of future science, and create powerful very effective tools for early cancer detection to save millions of lives that are hundreds of times more efficient at identifying cancerous cells than any device currently on the market, requiring 1% radiation of the over 10,000 PET devices (Positron Emission Tomography) currently in use at an affordable examination cost. Because both types of tools are based on particle detection techniques which is your specialized field at CERN, I am respectfully requesting that you, Andy Lankford and Nadia Pastrone organize a public meeting to address my invention for the advancement in particle detection. Continue reading

Share it!Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on TumblrEmail this to someone

What does this mean? What can happen next? What help is needed from investigative journalists?

On February 21, 2017 Crosetto received an Appeal response letter from the Director of the DOE Office of Hearings and Appeals dated February 1, 2017, stating: “The Appeal filed on January 6, 2017 by Dario B. Crosetto, Case No FIA-17-001, is hereby granted… This matter is hereby remanded to the Department of Energy’s Office of Public Information, which shall issue a new determination in accordance with the instructions set forth in the above Decision.” Continue reading

Share it!Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on TumblrEmail this to someone

Your help is needed in forwarding this message and asking to address publicly these issues to Dr. Cherry Murray (camurray@seas.harvard.edu), U.S. DOE Director of the Office of Science, Dr. Francis Collins (Collinsf@od.nih.gov) Director of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), Dr. Douglas Lowy (LowyD@mail.nih.gov) Director of the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) and other people among the recipient of this email who freely accepted positions of responsibility and promised to work to make a better world. Continue reading

Share it!Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on TumblrEmail this to someone

In 4 years we have another election in the U.S., many elections in Europe and in other countries in the world, however, cancer will still be there if scientific issues are not addressed FOR A WORLD OF REASON&SCIENCE RE: Innovations saving lives and taxpayer money. Continue reading

Share it!Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on TumblrEmail this to someone

Dear President Obama,

Add your name to tell scientists handling taxpayer money to do their job.  

Tell them to distribute funds for cancer research by implementing public, transparent procedures based on calculations, analytical and scientific evidence, objective, data-driven analysis and not distributing taxpayer money to a circle of friends behind closed door. Continue reading

Share it!Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on TumblrEmail this to someone

Figure_Solution_4Dear President Obama and Cancer Moonshot Task Force,

On behalf of the 7000 people who signed a petition, the 1600 Americans dying every day from cancer (one every 4 seconds in the world), I respectfully request you call for a public ANALYTICAL and SCIENTIFIC discussion of my 413-page invention to solve the cancer dilemma through an effective early detection between myself, the DOE and NIH-NCI experts responsible for spending taxpayer money to advance science, significantly reduce cancer deaths and healthcare costs. Continue reading

Share it!Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on TumblrEmail this to someone

Analogy_Students_San_AntonioHere you will find an explanation of the concept of my invention of how to extract all valuable data from radiation arriving at Medical Imaging devices at ultra-high speed by solving the envelope analogy posed to you on April 17, 2016. The invention enables an effective early cancer detection that can reduce cancer death by over 50%.   The layman can easily understand the envelope analogy by watching 70 seconds of video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwMnHRuWo4o, beginning at minute 7:58 showing an experiment conducted by high school students at a San Antonio, Texas High School Continue reading

Share it!Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on TumblrEmail this to someone

 

Biden_Children_Grandchildren2Dear Vice-President Biden,  could you please ask your grandchildren if they consider it essential for those who want to implement a project to end cancer to be asked for an estimate of the percentage of cancer death reduction they expect to attain, the cost to develop their project, where to find a link to support their claims, and for those claiming highest potential to reduce cancer deaths, do they believe the candidates should be able to question each other in a public debate in a style similar to the presidential debate before they receive taxpayer money? Continue reading

Share it!Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on TumblrEmail this to someone
Site Overview
Please visit our
Site Overview for help in navigating the site.
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Upcoming Events
July 2017
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
June 26, 2017 June 27, 2017 June 28, 2017 June 29, 2017 June 30, 2017 July 1, 2017 July 2, 2017
July 3, 2017 July 4, 2017 July 5, 2017 July 6, 2017 July 7, 2017 July 8, 2017 July 9, 2017
July 10, 2017 July 11, 2017 July 12, 2017 July 13, 2017 July 14, 2017 July 15, 2017 July 16, 2017
July 17, 2017 July 18, 2017 July 19, 2017 July 20, 2017 July 21, 2017 July 22, 2017 July 23, 2017
July 24, 2017 July 25, 2017 July 26, 2017 July 27, 2017 July 28, 2017 July 29, 2017 July 30, 2017
July 31, 2017 August 1, 2017 August 2, 2017 August 3, 2017 August 4, 2017 August 5, 2017 August 6, 2017
Recent Comments