This document is available in pdf at: goo.gl/4Nn2jS
Crosetto has summarized to MIT and Harvard experts the essence of the disruptive advantages of his inventions as follow: I have invented a revolutionary electronic technology-independent architecture/instrument proven feasible by 59 quotes from reputable industries to build using 2015 technology a 3D-Flow OPRA (Object Pattern real-time Recognition Algorithms) system with 8,192 channels, in 36 cm (15 inch) cube of electronics capable of sustaining over 1.3TB/sec input data rate, and execute with zero dead-time on the input data, complex programmable real-time Object Pattern Recognition Algorithms (OPRA) at a production cost of approximately $100,000. In the same volume of 36 cm cube of electronics, it is feasible to build a 3D-Flow OPRA system with 20,000 channels capable of sustaining over 20TB/sec input data rate. Larger systems can be built by linking several similar cubes of electronics. Continue reading
Dear Dr. Michael Corbat, CEO of Citigroup, Dear Dr. James Forese, President of Citigroup, Dear members of the Board of Directors and the Executive board of Citigroup, Dear decision makers, leaders in the field, investigative journalists and those who care to make the scientific truth for the benefit of humanity prevail, we should work together to demand and implement transparency in science (please see APPEDIX for references to information supporting these claims). What is needed is to address the real problem that influential scientists handling taxpayer money have the responsibility to make the scientific truth emerge through transparent, public, scientific reviews, rather than wasting taxpayer money. Continue reading
This document is available in PDF at Google Drive goo.gl/hea4EC
Dear Dr. Cherry Murray, Benjamin Peirce Professor of Technology and Public Policy at Harvard SEAS, former Director of the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).
I respectfully request you address the proof that my invention, proven feasible by 59 quotes from reputable industries, can replace 4,000 CMS electronic data processing boards (goo.gl/mPHw5Y) funded by DOE with my 9 electronic data processing boards (goo.gl/OTkH4z) while providing an enormous performance improvement at one thousandth the cost. Continue reading
Inconsistencies in science prevent us from reducing over 50% the mortality of the most deadly and costly calamity in the world, cancer and reduce healthcare costs and from saving hundreds of millions of taxpayers’ dollars from the biggest and most expensive experiment in the history of the planet at CERN and from building powerful tools to advance science. Continue reading
See the PDF of this document at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxWfo2ViJ6r5c25sYmh1SnJTa00/view?usp=sharing. Dear Joel Butler, Thank you for your response and for your question.
My goal is to help you and CERN build the most powerful tools to uncover the unknown, beyond the imagination of future science, and create powerful very effective tools for early cancer detection to save millions of lives that are hundreds of times more efficient at identifying cancerous cells than any device currently on the market, requiring 1% radiation of the over 10,000 PET devices (Positron Emission Tomography) currently in use at an affordable examination cost. Because both types of tools are based on particle detection techniques which is your specialized field at CERN, I am respectfully requesting that you, Andy Lankford and Nadia Pastrone organize a public meeting to address my invention for the advancement in particle detection. Continue reading
What does this mean? What can happen next? What help is needed from investigative journalists?
On February 21, 2017 Crosetto received an Appeal response letter from the Director of the DOE Office of Hearings and Appeals dated February 1, 2017, stating: “The Appeal filed on January 6, 2017 by Dario B. Crosetto, Case No FIA-17-001, is hereby granted… This matter is hereby remanded to the Department of Energy’s Office of Public Information, which shall issue a new determination in accordance with the instructions set forth in the above Decision.” Continue reading
Your help is needed in forwarding this message and asking to address publicly these issues to Dr. Cherry Murray (firstname.lastname@example.org), U.S. DOE Director of the Office of Science, Dr. Francis Collins (Collinsf@od.nih.gov) Director of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), Dr. Douglas Lowy (LowyD@mail.nih.gov) Director of the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) and other people among the recipient of this email who freely accepted positions of responsibility and promised to work to make a better world. Continue reading
An invention constituting an important scientific advance for the detection and prevention of various cancers and other pathologies has been hampered if not compromised by the attitudes and obstructions of certain scientific, economic and political circles Continue reading
In 4 years we have another election in the U.S., many elections in Europe and in other countries in the world, however, cancer will still be there if scientific issues are not addressed FOR A WORLD OF REASON&SCIENCE RE: Innovations saving lives and taxpayer money. Continue reading