The Future is in Our Hands
Information, Awareness, Prevention / United to End Cancer

Dear President Obama,

I received this email on 5/31/2016 from Barack Obama.

“Dario – When I look back over the past seven years, so much of what we fought for we did because it was common sense. …But… that kind of common sense isn’t all that common when it comes…”. Forgive me if I bring your attention to how I fought for 15 years for common sense and now you can be an important game-changer.You can set a few simple rules for government employees handling taxpayer money to be accountable by applying the common sense you wrote to me about in your letter dated 9/25/15 where analytical thinking is used when deciding which scientists, innovators, technologists receive the tools (grants) to benefit taxpayers and eliminate scientific corruption.

Simply: ENFORCE TRANSPARENCY IN SCIENCE by assigning taxpayer money to research projects after a PUBLIC scientific review process based on calculations, analytical and scientific evidence.

This will benefit taxpayers and cure the corruption in the scientific community by not nurturing the corrupted scientists, but nurturing projects that have been compared publicly with all others.

Here are two of many examples where NIH & DOE made bad funding choices causing the loss of millions of lives and wasting billions of taxpayer dollars when a common sense question could have revealed their inconsistency:

  1. Would a policeman be protected by a thin bullet-proof vest with holes like Swiss cheese? Then why did NIH fund Swiss-cheese like detector modules for cancer patients that cannot detect signals from tumor markers? For example: NIH grants R01 CA119056, R01 CA119056S1 (ARRA), R01 CA120474, and R01 EB011552 and DOE grant DESC0005290 which funded Craig Levin’s “block detector” with 1x1x1 mm3 crystals and many holes between the crystals that cannot capture the photons generated from the tumor markers. This NIH million $ cannot reduce cancer deaths but enabled him to be Chairman of the 2013 IEEE-MIC in which 16 of his articles were accepted by his circle of friends while rejecting my one article that would have saved millions of lives.
  2. Now NIH is funding the $15.5 million Explorer project whose cost, efficiency and scientific evidence show it cannot significantly reduce cancer deaths. Why is NIH funding a circle of friends who after rejecting my idea for 15 years, copied my idea and now propose a less efficient device costing 10 times my 3D-CBS technology?

One Response to President Obama it’s just common sense to protect policemen with a thick bullet-proof vest with no holes, why NIH is funding thin Swiss-cheese like detectors with holes that cannot stop photons from tumor markers that would allow to reduce radiation to the patient and enable effective early cancer detection?

  • Jennifer Colburn says:

    The only way to stop corruption in all walks of life is with transparency. There is so much corruption that we hear about in politics, banking etc. that we are not paying attention to scientists who are human and subject to corruption like so many of us. This involves your tax-dollars, but the broader implication is lives are being lost to cancer and other diseases by funding the wrong projects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Site Overview
Please visit our
Site Overview for help in navigating the site.
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Upcoming Events
July 2020
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
June 29, 2020 June 30, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 2, 2020 July 3, 2020 July 4, 2020 July 5, 2020
July 6, 2020 July 7, 2020 July 8, 2020 July 9, 2020 July 10, 2020 July 11, 2020 July 12, 2020
July 13, 2020 July 14, 2020 July 15, 2020 July 16, 2020 July 17, 2020 July 18, 2020 July 19, 2020
July 20, 2020 July 21, 2020 July 22, 2020 July 23, 2020 July 24, 2020 July 25, 2020 July 26, 2020
July 27, 2020 July 28, 2020 July 29, 2020 July 30, 2020 July 31, 2020 August 1, 2020 August 2, 2020