The Future is in Our Hands
Blog
Information, Awareness, Prevention / United to End Cancer

This document is available in pdf at: goo.gl/u9GE1Z

My 3D-Flow OPRA (Object Pattern real-time Recognition Algorithms), invention recognized valuable by an official, formal, public, international scientific review ‘goo.gl/zP76Tc could have already saved hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars, and its application, my 3D-CBS invention (3-D Complete Body Screening), which won the Leonardo da Vinci Prize in 2011, could have already saved millions of lives with an effective early cancer detection technology. Responsible action by decision-makers and experts in the field to compare the 3D-Flow OPRA and 3D-CBS inventions with alternative approaches is long overdue. The alternative approaches have been funded, although far less efficient and at a greater cost.

August 26, 2017

Dr. Michael Corbat, Chief Executive Officer of Citigroup

P.O. Box 6000

Sioux Falls, SD 57117-6000

 

Via USPS Certified Mail: Tracking 7017 1070 0000 5302 3280

 

Dr. G. Stevens, Vice President Citibank, N.A.

P.O. Box 6077

Sioux Falls, SD 57117

 

Via USPS Certified Mail: Tracking 7017 1070 0000 5302 3273

cc. Citibank/Citigroup – Office of the President

Dr. James Forese, President Citigroup and CEO of the Institutional Clients Group

388 Greenwich Street

New York, NY 10013

cc. Citigroup Board of Directors;

Michael Corbat, Chief Executive Officer, Citigroup; Ellen M. Costello, Former President, CEO, BMO Financial Corporation, and Former U.S. Country Head; Duncan P. Hennes, Co-Founder and Partner of Atrevida Partners, LLC; Peter Blair Henry, Dean, New York University, Stern School of Business; Franz B. Humer, Former Chairman, Roche Holding Ltd; Renée J. James, Operating Executive, The Carlyle Group; Gene McQuade, Former Chief Executive Officer, Citibank, N.A. and Vice Chairman, Citigroup Inc.; Michael E. O’Neill, Chairman, Citigroup Inc.; Gary M. Reiner, Operating Partner, General Atlantic LLC; Anthony M. Santomero, Former President, Federal Reserve, Bank of Philadelphia; Diana L. Taylor, Vice Chair, Solera Capital LLC; James S. Turley, Former Chairman and CEO, Ernst & Young; Deborah C. Wright, former Chairman of Carver Bancorp, Inc.; Ernesto Zedillo, Director, Center for the Study of Globalization and Professor in the Field of International Economics and Politics, Yale University; ;

cc. Citigroup Operating Committee:

Francisco A. Aristeguieta, Chief Executive Officer, Asia Pacific; Stephen Bird, Chief Executive Officer, Global Consumer Banking; Don Callahan, Head of Operations & Technology Mark Carawan, Chief Compliance OfficerMichael Corbat, Chief Executive Officer, Citigroup; James C. Cowles, Chief Executive Officer, Europe, Middle East & Africa; Barbara Desoer, CEO, Citibank, N.A.; James A. Forese, President, Citigroup CEO, Institutional Clients Group; Jane Fraser, Chief Executive Officer, Latin America; John C. Gerspach, Chief Financial Officer, Citigroup; Bradford Hu, Chief Risk Officer; Jud Linville, Chief Executive Officer, Citi Cards; William J. Mills, Chief Executive Officer, North America; Michael Murray, Head of Human Resources; Edward Skyler, Executive Vice President, Global Public Affairs; Ernesto Torres Cantu, CEO of Citibanamex Francesco Vanni d’Archirafi, Chief Executive Officer, Citi Holdings; Rohan Weerasinghe, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Citigroup; Paco Ybarra,  Global Head of Markets and Securities Services

cc. Leaders, experts in the field, journalists and everyone holding a position of responsibilities to serve the interest of taxpayers and cancer patients

cc.

 

Everyone who care to save hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayer money and reducing significantly cancer deaths and costs with a breakthrough technological invention for an effective early cancer detection proven feasible by 59 quotes from reputable industries that is waiting to be examined in a public scientific review since approximately two years. We have needlessly lost money and lives because these innovations continue to be suppressed. Everyone can contribute to accelerate the transfer of the benefits from innovations to the bed of the patient by supporting transparency in science, Signing the Petition at ‘goo.gl/dzmYCz’.

 

Citi® / AAdvantage® Gold

Account ending in 9449 – Member since 1995

 

CitiBusiness® / AAdvantage® Platinum Select®

Account ending in 1138 – Member since 2013

 

Subject: Respectfully requesting to address my concerns that my work with no income for 18 years to serve you, your grandchildren and humanity in avoiding the suffering of many people by significantly reducing everyone’s risk to die prematurely from cancer with an effective early cancer detection, deserves, to be considered for a reduction of your high profit in fees and interest on my account ending 9449 from $11,006.74 to $1,390.83 that I have already paid (goo.gl/AlWHvC). I respectfully request to make exceptions to all rules in place, as Citigroup contingent situation in 2008 convinced the Government to shoulder Citigroup losses and injected new capital of $306 billion, making exceptions to all rules in place, to avoid hurting many people. My cause for avoiding the suffering of many people deserves the same consideration as the Government gave to Citigroup in 2008. Please find the list of facts at goo.gl/XtMkJc explaining who has been responsible during the past years for the delays on actions that were duties of their job description that have caused fees and interests in using my credit line with Citigroup. As I explained before I have used the personal credit line at Citigroup because I had compassion for the 8.2 million people dying from cancer every year, knowing that many of them (over 50% of those who could be examined yearly by a 3D-CBS device) could have been saved with my 3D-CBS (3-D Complete Body Screening), effective for early cancer detection which is what it saves lives.

 

Dear Dr. Corbat, Dr. Stevens, members of Citigroup Board of Directors, members of the Citigroup Operating Committee, leaders and experts holding a position of responsibility in the field, journalists serving the interest of the public and everyone who care to significantly reduce cancer deaths and costs,

 

This letter is respectfully answering to the several letters from Citigroup Office of the President since July 2016, and several letters and emails from Dr. G. Stevens, Vice President Citibank N.A., last of which received today, August 26, 2017 as reported in Appendix C and is addressing this problem at its roots with all parties involved in solving it.

 

First I like to thank Citigroup for not taking negative actions further damaging me and my cause during the past three months. As I mentioned before the negative actions taken by Citigroup toward me personally during the previous year made plunge my credit score (that took me 25 years to build), from 820 to 627. Now is going up again and is at 733, however, it will take a long time to get back to 820 and if you take the action anticipated in today’s email reported in Appendix C: «your account will be reported as “charged-off” to the major credit bureau reporting agencies» it will plunge again to a lower number instead of going up. In addition, your actions of the past months caused further damages that I was refused a credit line at zero interest from other Credit Cards, shrinking the buffer of the money needed to implement transparency and scientific procedures to make the scientific truth for the benefit of all of us emerge and prevail with the dialogue with leaders and experts in the field, which is partially described at this link goo.gl/XtMkJc.

 

If this letter is not providing compelling arguments justifying the request to reduce your high profit for a cause that is benefitting humanity, including you and Citigroup employees, please hold back your action anticipated in your today’s email and let’s continue to exchange letters to come to a better understanding of this case. Forgive me if I do not call the number you have provided in your emails, however, in the past months I received over 800 phone calls from Citigroup and I spent hours on the phone with Citigroup agents from different departments and every time I talked with a different agent who was not aware of this case and who did not have access to all our past correspondence. I spent hours to read a few of the last letters to them, but at the end they could not respond to my concerns and pertinent questions that I was not asking to lend money with a loss, but just to reduce Citigroup high profit considering this cause that I have been working with no income to provide a substantial contribution to defeat the most deadly and costly calamity. I respectfully request to continue these exchange of letters, so we can further address this problem and I will provide a weekly update about the result of the discussion with all experts in the field from the world’s most prestigious universities, in particular from the experts recommended by CERN Director General who appointed Andrew Lankford, Joel Butler and Nadia Pastrone to organize a scientific discussion/review of my inventions at CERN in Geneva.

 

My 3D-Flow OPRA (Object Pattern real-time Recognition Algorithms), invention recognized valuable by an official, formal, public, international scientific review ‘goo.gl/zP76Tc could have already saved hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars, and its application, my 3D-CBS invention (3-D Complete Body Screening), which won the Leonardo da Vinci Prize in 2011, could have already saved millions of lives with an effective early cancer detection technology. Responsible action by decision-makers and experts in the field to compare the 3D-Flow OPRA and 3D-CBS inventions with alternative approaches is long overdue. The alternative approaches have been funded, although far less efficient and at a greater cost. My inventions have been shown to be superior to alternative approaches since their conception more than one decade ago. Recently, in December 22, 2015, fifty-nine quotes from reputable industries proved feasibility to replace 4,000 electronic boards with nine 3D-Flow OPRA boards, while providing higher performance at one thousandth the cost in experiments in physics at CERN, and my 3D-CBS invention can reduce cancer deaths by over 50%, through an effective early cancer detection.

 

None of the agencies and experts in the field who are responsible to serve the interest of taxpayers and cancer patients that I contacted have made an in-depth study of my project and the 59 quotes proving disruptive advantages and benefits of my inventions. Because of this, during the past two years, hundreds of millions of taxpayer money continue to be wasted and many lives continue to be needlessly lost from cancer.

 

I am asking to consider my request so I can continue this civil, respectful dialogue with the people responsible to examine my breakthrough inventions to accelerate the benefit to all of us.

 

Please find attached:

 

  • Appendix A: Summary of the current situation regarding this dialogue with the leaders and expert in the field and the essence and disruptive benefits of my inventions.

 

  • Appendix B: Links to the most recent articles reporting the dialogue with the leaders and expert in the field.

 

  • Appendix C: Copy of your email received today.

 

  • Appendix D: Copy of some of the previous correspondence.

 

I am looking forward receiving your prompt and considered response.

 

Sincerely,

 

Dario Crosetto

President of the Crosetto Foundation for the Reduction of Cancer Deaths

900 Hideaway Pl.

DeSoto, TX 75115

Email: crosettodario@gmail.com

 

Appendix A: Summary of the current situation regarding this dialogue with the leaders and expert in the field and the essence and disruptive benefits of my inventions. 

This document is available in pdf at: goo.gl/EJpKyq and in HTML at: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2101

The entire list of documents is at: goo.gl/XtMkJc. See also the Blog at: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?cat=20

 

We need more journalists with the courage to inform their readers of the scientific truth which will benefit humanity by reporting statements made by scientists and reviewers holding positions of responsibility and my responses to them. The statements were made by CERN CMS Spokesperson, Joel Butler goo.gl/k46ea6,who represents 5,000 scientists at CERN, Pavia’s University-INFN reviewers (summary goo.gl/ivcYPC and details goo.gl/J9h4qL), Andy Lankford goo.gl/EJpKyq, and Nadia Pastrone goo.gl/iEph5R., All these scientists backed away from previous statements they made supporting transparency and the scientific truth, whereas my responses defend the public interest.

 

To adhere to standard scientific procedures, and to be fair to taxpayers, these reviewers should explain why they recanted their previous statements which validated the 3D-Flow technology. Despite CERN Director General Dr. F. Gianotti appointing Lankford, Butler and Pastrone to organize a scientific discussion/review of my 3D-Flow OPRA invention at CERN in an email sent to them on February 7, 2017, and copied to the Honorable G. Pittella, head of the second largest political party of the European Parliament, his collaborators, Dr. V. Vigna and Dr. N. Carmine and myself, to show CERN’s commitment to transparency in science. However, they impeded a discussion-review with their statements, which denied transparency and the scientific truth as they stated in the articles at these links goo.gl/EJpKyq, goo.gl/k46ea6 and goo.gl/iEph5R. A standard scientific procedure would require Lankford, Butler and Pastrone to attempt to invalidate (and face the reactions) the written statements made during a formal, official, international, public scientific review they had organized (goo.gl/ZJh0Kg, goo.gl/8jaxDH), at FERMILAB in 1993, which recognized the value of my invention ‘goo.gl/zP76Tc’. They would also have to invalidate the written statements by many scientists (see citations at “goo.gl/GIC5aR” a few complete letters at “goo.gl/VXBx33) who endorsed and supported the value of my invention, and they would need to demonstrate the professional incompetence (and face the reactions) from all the engineers who proved, in their 59 quotes, the feasibility of my invention to replace 4,000 electronic boards of CERN CMS L-1 trigger with 9 of my 3D-Flow OPRA boards which offer higher speed of the input data and more accurate results at one thousandth the cost. If the above standard scientific procedure and information to the public does not take place, then journalists should report the statements made by the above-mentioned people as they silence the truth and suppress innovations beneficial to humanity.

 

A local journalist who reported the above discussion in English stated: “We do this in the hopes of spreading greater understanding of an endeavor that could change the tide of the war on cancer forever.” Journalists should follow his example and report the answers or non-answers from experts in the field from prestigious universities, to avoid events similar to the article on the MIT Technology Review in 2016 which was not aware ‘goo.gl/2CLTsP’ that my invention answered 25 years ago MIT’s basic question regarding making computers more capable after Moore’s law was declared dead.

 

My 3D-Flow OPRA (Object Pattern real-time Recognition Algorithms) invention could have already saved hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars, and its application, my 3D-CBS invention (3-D Complete Body Screening, see 11-minute video at: goo.gl/tKGUjw), which won the Leonardo da Vinci Prize in 2011, could have already saved millions of lives with an effective early cancer detection technology (See supporting material at: goo.gl/dYGusD).

 

Taxpayers and cancer patients ask that these innovations beneficial to humanity be examined publicly, scientifically and funded.

 

Responsible action by decision-makers and experts in the field to compare the 3D-Flow OPRA and 3D-CBS inventions with alternative approaches is long overdue. The alternative approaches have been funded, although far less efficient and at a greater cost.

 

This legitimizes and justifies the request by taxpayers for the most prestigious universities to examine my inventions and my responses to experts in the field and a request for everyone who cares about saving taxpayer money and significantly reducing cancer deaths to Sign the Petition at goo.gl/dzmYCz which requests a public scientific discussion/review of my inventions at CERN in Geneva, as in 1993 at Fermilab

 

The essence and disruptive benefits of my inventions are the following:

My 3D-Flow invention could have replaced hundreds of crates containing 4,000 electronic boards of CERN CMS L-1 Trigger Experiment, at a fraction of the cost while providing more performance as reported on pages 102-117 of ‘goo.gl/w3XlZ1’, and could have replaced the trigger at many other experiments at CERN. For example, in 1994 with a cylinder of electronics 1.8m tall x 1m in diameter, in 1999 with 6 x 9U VME crates as described in the 45-page peer-reviewed article published by Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Sec. A, vol. 436, (1999) pp.341-385. In 2015, my basic ‘goo.gl/NQ8Cck’ 3D-Flow parallel-processing architecture and the synergy of its implementation in its different parts was summarized in two pages at ‘goo.gl/AoszvQ’ and detailed at ‘goo.gl/w3XlZ1’. It provided the inventive step of the new 3D-Flow OPRA technology with unprecedented advantages, replacing hundreds of crates of electronics containing 4,000 electronic boards with one crate containing 9 of my 3D-Flow OPRA boards, while providing higher performance at one thousandth the cost. Fifty-nine quotes from reputable industries prove the feasibility to build a 3D-Flow OPRA system with over 10,000 channels, in one 36 cm (15 inch) cube of electronics capable of sustaining several terabytes/sec. of input data, and execute complex real-time Object Pattern Recognition Algorithms (OPRA) at a production cost of approximately $100,000. Larger systems can be built by linking several similar cubes of electronics.

 

In addition, when the 3D-Flow OPRA invention is used in the 3D-CBS (3-D Complete Body Screening) technology, it makes it hundreds of times more efficient than the over 10,000 PET (Positron Emission Tomography) devices used in hospitals (see 11-minute video at: goo.gl/tKGUjw). The 3D-CBS can claim for the first time a true paradigm change in molecular imaging because it can offer at the same time the three advantages of a) an effective detection of diseases such as cancer at a very early and highly curable stage, and improved diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of treatments, b) a radiation dose that is 1% of current PET and c) a 4-minute, very low examination cost that will cover all organs of the body. Hence, screening of specific organs currently performed by a mammogram, PAP-test, colonoscopy, and PSA would become unnecessary. The 3D-CBS invention can reduce cancer deaths by over 50% through an effective early detection while reducing healthcare costs. This is not my claim but experimental data over 50 years proves it and is confirmed by major cancer organizations. I am claiming it can achieve the three goals listed above that create a paradigm change in molecular imaging enabling an effective early cancer detection which is what saves lives. (See the 2000 book: “400+ times improved PET efficiency for lower-dose radiation, lower-cost cancer screening at ‘goo.gl/ggGGwF’, see trifold at “goo.gl/YcAJDy“, more details at “goo.gl/JMKyek“, the five-page 2003 article at ‘goo.gl/RiIn0B’, the 32-page 2013 article at “goo.gl/qpnNxd”, one-page innovations at “goo.gl/3AFCWM”, one-page benefits at ‘goo.gl/Zx1p9Q’, two-page 2016 summary and comparison with the Explorer at: ‘goo.gl/QLuA1n’ and the source information from the authors of the “Explorer Project” at ‘goo.gl/Tl95NN’ or at ‘goo.gl/ovMZ5j’, which was funded by NIH for $15.5 million although less efficient, incapable of saving many lives and more than ten times expensive as the 3D-CBS).

Appendix B: Links to the most recent articles reporting the dialogue with the leaders and expert in the field.

 

This document can be found in pdf at this link: goo.gl/XtMkJc.

 

I respectfully request journalists to inform their readers about the following inconsistencies in science that are damaging taxpayers and cancer patients regarding the biggest and most expensive experiment in the history of the planet at CERN where we can replace 4,000 electronic boards with 9 electronic boards with higher performance and at one thousandth the cost and regarding the world’s most deadly and costly calamity, cancer, that can be defeated with the 3D-CBS (3-D Complete Body Screening) technology targeted to early cancer detection with the potential to reduce by over 50% cancer deaths, because it is hundreds of times more efficient than the over 10,000 current PET (Positron Emission Tomography).

 

See answers to some common questions asked from the public that Crosetto prepared for the journalists at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxWfo2ViJ6r5aU51LVVIRXhoUlU/view?usp=sharing

 

Example of articles informing their readers:

 

Articles with the title in red are reporting the answers to the reviewers of the 3D-Flow OPRA and 3D-CBS inventions.

 

In English:

 

Week 18: (08/23/2017). “Crosetto Responds to Dr. Lankford” in pdf at: goo.gl/EJpKyq and in HTML at: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2101 

 

Week 17: (08/16/2017). “Dr. Nadia Pastrone Wavers On Scientific Truth and Transparency” in pdf at: goo.gl/iEph5R and in HTML at: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2040  

 

Week 16: (08/09/2017). “Crosetto Responds To Dr. Joel Butler, CERN CMS Spokesperson Regarding 3D-Flow”. In pdf at: goo.gl/k46ea6 and in HTML at: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2036     

 

Week 15: (08/02/2017). “Dr. Andy Lankford Responds To 3D-Flow OPRA Review Request” in pdf at: goo.gl/B7RrrL and in HTML at: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2038.

 

Week 14: (07/26/2017). “Scientific Transparency: You can Help!” Letter to MIT in pdf at: goo.gl/2CLTsP and in HTML at: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2044.

 

Week 13: (07/19/2017). “Experts Sought In Defense of Cancer Prevention Technology” Letter to Harvard SEAS University  

 

Week 12: (07/12/2017). “In Defense of Taxpayers and Cancer Patients” Crosetto’s Summary Response to Pavia-INFN-CERN review of the 3D-Flow OPRA, in pdf at: goo.gl/ivcYPC in HTML at: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2027. Crosetto’s Detailed Response to Pavia-INFN-CERN review of the 3D-Flow OPRA, in pdf at: goo.gl/J9h4qL and in HTML at: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2016

 

Week 11: (07/05/2017). “The True Cost of over $50 billion of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN”. in pdf at: goo.gl/H4Q7Hs and in HTML at: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2082   

 

Week 10: (06/21/2017). “CERN Scientists Address the 3D-Flow Claims vs. Supercomputers” in pdf at: goo.gl/R9eUZh and in HTML at: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2080   

 

Week 9a: (06/08/2017). “3D-Flow OPRA: A Solution for Several Triggers in HEP and for other applications” in pdf at: goo.gl/sqcqod and in HTML at: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2086   

 

Week 9: (05/24/2017) “Scientific Research Could Mean Major Advances: the Role of CERN” in pdf at: goo.gl/X7Ebzh and in HTML at: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2094 and at:  http://www.focusdailynews.com/2017/05/24/scientific-research-mean-major-advances/   

 

Posted on Facebook: “A task of scientists at CERN is to build powerful, precise tools breaking the limits of technology which are able to confirm or exclude the existence of a subatomic particle predicted by theoretical physicists, and to uncover the unknown. These tools should be tested in a controlled environment to guarantee performance in an unpredictable, uncontrolled environment.”  – Dario Crosetto.

 

Support REVEALING the scientific truth for the benefit of humanity by signing the petition at https://www.change.org/p/cardio-surgeon-who-supports-the-scientific-truth-dr-vincenzo-vigna-stop-suppressing-crosetto-s-lifesaving-technology-we-demand-an-investigation

 

Week 8: (05/17/2017) “3-D Complete Body Screening = Early Cancer Detection” in pdf at: goo.gl/EUtZmJ and in HTML at: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2099 and at FDN: http://www.focusdailynews.com/2017/05/17/3-d-body-screening-early-cancer-detection/  

 

Posted on Facebook: “THE GOOD THING ABOUT SCIENCE IS THAT IT’S TRUE WHETHER OR NOT YOU BELIEVE IN IT” – Neil Degrasse Tyson.

 

THE SCIENTIST ONLY IMPOSES TWO THINGS, NAMELY TRUTH AND SINCERITY, IMPOSES THEM UPON HIMSELF AND UPON OTHER SCIENTISTS” – Erwin Schrodinger.

 

THE PROBLEM IS NOT THE ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE BUT THE SUPPRESSION OF IT” – Ravi Zacharias.

 

Support REVEALING the scientific truth for the benefit of humanity by signing the petition at https://www.change.org/p/cardio-surgeon-who-supports-the-scientific-truth-dr-vincenzo-vigna-stop-suppressing-crosetto-s-lifesaving-technology-we-demand-an-investigation

 

Week 7: (05/10/2017): “Crosetto Touts 3D-CBS Innovative Efficiency” http://www.focusdailynews.com/2017/05/10/crosetto-touts-3d-cbs-innovative-efficiency/  

 

Posted on Facebook: “Few are those who see with their own eyes and feel with their own hearts” -Albert Einstein.

 

How many more years will it take to stop wasting hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars on system like the 4,000 CMS electronic boards, knowing that it can be replaced with nine 3D-Flow OPRA boards, more performant and at one thousandth the cost?

 

How many more years will it take to stop needlessly losing millions of lives from cancer, knowing that early detection can save more than 50% of them and the 3D-CBS (3-D Complete Body Screening) invention, hundreds of times more efficient than current over 10,000 PET (Positron Emission Tomography) enables an effective early detection of cancer at a curable stage, requiring 1% the radiation dose of the current PET, with a 4-minute affordable examination covering all organs of the body that can replace more cost-effectively several screening procedures such as the mammogram, PAP-test, colonoscopy, and PSA?

 

How many more weeks (or months) will it take before Andrew Lankford, Joel Butler and Nadia Pastrone appointed by CERN Director General on February 2, 2017 to organize a public scientific discussion/review at CERN of Crosetto’s inventions will take place, where he can answer the non-scientific objections from the opponents of his inventions who, during the past two decades, have wasted taxpayer money in less efficient and more costly systems?

 

Support REVEALING the scientific truth for the benefit of humanity by signing the petition at https://www.change.org/p/cardio-surgeon-who-supports-the-scientific-truth-dr-vincenzo-vigna-stop-suppressing-crosetto-s-lifesaving-technology-we-demand-an-investigation

 

Week 6: (05/03/2017): “Suppression And The Semmelweis Effect” http://www.focusdailynews.com/2017/05/03/suppression-semmelweis-effect/

 

Posted on Facebook: “THE HARDER YOU TRY TO SUPPRESS THE TRUTH, THE MORE INEVITABLE IT IS THAT IT WILL FIND A WAY TO COME OUT” – Arianna Huffington.

 

Support REVEALING the scientific truth for the benefit of humanity by signing the petition at https://www.change.org/p/cardio-surgeon-who-supports-the-scientific-truth-dr-vincenzo-vigna-stop-suppressing-crosetto-s-lifesaving-technology-we-demand-an-investigation

 

Week 5: (4/26/2017): “3D-Flow Technology Touts economy, Functionality” http://www.focusdailynews.com/2017/04/26/3d-flow-technology-touts-economy-functionality/

 

Posted on Facebook: “THE FURTHER A SOCIETY DRIFTS FROM THE TRUTH, THE MORE IT WILL HATE THOSE WHO SPEAK IT“. -George Orwell.

 

Support REVEALING the scientific truth for the benefit of humanity by signing the petition https://www.change.org/p/cardio-surgeon-who-supports-the-scientific-truth-dr-vincenzo-vigna-stop-suppressing-crosetto-s-lifesaving-technology-we-demand-an-investigation

 

Week 4: (04/19/2017): “Crosetto Confronts Modern Day Suppression” http://www.focusdailynews.com/2017/04/19/crosetto-confronts-modern-day-suppression/

 

Posted on Facebook: “Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters” -Albert Einstein.

 

Support revealing the scientific truth for the benefit of humanity by signing the petition https://www.change.org/p/cardio-surgeon-who-supports-the-scientific-truth-dr-vincenzo-vigna-stop-suppressing-crosetto-s-lifesaving-technology-we-demand-an-investigation

 

Week 3: (04/12/2017): “Mis-Application Of Taxpayer Money In Science” http://www.focusdailynews.com/2017/04/12/mis-application-of-taxpayer-money-in-science-wednesday-april-12/

 

Posted on Facebook: Saving hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayer money and millions of lives.

 

Question for Decision Makers Andrew Lankford and Joel Butler: in 1993 and 1995 respectively, you both wrote statements endorsing and supporting the 3D-Flow technology. Hence, could you please identify any Level-1 Trigger project (“The Trap”) for which you could make a similar statement today?

 

Question for Nadia Pastrone after her June 3rd, 2016 statement. “What actions have you taken to accelerate the benefits from Crosetto’s inventions to taxpayers?

 

Week 2: (4/06/2017): “Residents Seek Answers On Life-Saving Cancer Technology” (web-copy) http://www.focusdailynews.com/2017/04/06/residents-seek-answers-life-saving-cancer-technology/

 

Week 2: (04/2/2017): “Residents Seek Answers On Life-Saving Cancer Technology” (paper copy) Focus Daily News,  Sunday paper copy: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxWfo2ViJ6r5eU5zT2pxR1I3Rms/view?usp=sharing

 

Week 1: (02/26/2017): “DeSoto Scientist Faces Science Establishment”Focus Daily News Sunday (Paper Copy): https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxWfo2ViJ6r5bFp0bkZoLWJ2Qnc/view?usp=sharing

 

Week 1: (02/18/2017): “DeSoto Scientist Dario Crosetto Battles Establishment”: (web-site copy) http://www.focusdailynews.com/2017/02/18/desoto-scientist-dario-crosetto-3-d-complete-body-screening/

 

07/12/2013: “DeSoto inventor Crosetto eyes early cancer detection technology” The Dallas Morning News, July 12, 2013

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/dallas/2013/07/12/desoto-inventor-crosetto-eyes-early-cancer-detection-technology

 

 

 

Please Sign the Petition: goo.gl/dzmYCz

 

REFERENCES TO CROSETTO’S INVENTIONS

There is solid proof that over 50% of cancer deaths can be avoided with early detection as there are many treatment options when cancer is detected early and most have great success. Treatments, however, do not work when detected in cancer’s later stages. Take for example colon cancer: If caught early it has a 91% survival rate, versus 11% if caught too late. Breast cancer has a 98% survival rate when detected at an early stage and 27% when detected late. What is missing is a non-invasive diagnostic device effective for early cancer detection.

A solution providing effective early cancer detection has existed for 17 years. It is the 3D-CBS (3-D Complete Body Screening) life-saving technology based on the 3D-Flow OPRA invention. I can help investigative journalists working for this cause to inform them and the public, but I do not have your experience and your connections to the public.

We cannot let the public down on these two important issues.  You should give them a high priority because of the number of lives they affect and who will benefit. (Please sign the Petition at: goo.gl/dzmYCz)

What is missing is a non-invasive diagnostic device, effective for early cancer detection in all organs of the body that can capture the most relevant and reliable signals related to the mutation of the very first normal cells into cancerous cells. Among the change in odor, temperature, conductivity, fluorescence, density, metabolism etc. of normal cells into cancerous cells, the most reliable signal is the one related to a change in metabolism. Cancerous cells eat from 5 to 70 times more nutrient than normal cells because they grow faster than normal cells -the more aggressive the tumor is, the more nutrient it eats. The technique to track the nutrient delivered by the blood stream to the trillion cells in our body is called Positron Emission Technology (PET). It works by tagging the molecules of the nutrient to the body cells such as oxygen, glucose etc. with a radioisotope (radiation) that is emitting two 511 keV photons in opposite direction with an energy that can pass through flesh and bones and exit the body of the patient. The PET technique was invented in 1953 and today we have over 10,000 PET devices in use in hospitals. However, these PET devices are not useful for early detection because of their inefficiency of capturing only about 1 out of 10,000 pairs of good photons, requiring a high radiation dose to the patient. Because the basic technology is related to the efficiency in detecting specific subatomic particles among a huge number of signals received from the radiation, the breakthrough must come from the field of particle physics and should be in the Level-1 Trigger unit (or “The Trap”). My 3D-Flow invention that breaks the speed barrier in real-time application provides this breakthrough and has been recognized as valuable by academia, industries and research centers at a major public, scientific, international review (goo.gl/zP76Tc), endorsed by top experts in the field (goo.gl/GIC5aR and goo.gl/VXBx33), published in a 45-page article by a prestigious scientific journal (goo.gl/BlSzQu), and proven feasible and functional in hardware (goo.gl/RiIn0B). The 3D-Flow provides unprecedented advantages in capturing all possible good signals from radiation related to a rare particle in physics experiments and related to the tumor markers (511 keV photons) for medical imaging applications, at the lowest cost per valid signal captured compared to other approaches”.

My 3D-CBS (3-D Complete Body Screening) based on the 3D-Flow (see trifold goo.gl/YcAJDy”, and overview at “goo.gl/JMKyek”) is hundreds of times more efficient than the current over 10,000 PET devices. The 3D-Flow invention is technology-independent and can migrate to the most cost-effective technology. Both inventions 3D-Flow OPRA (Object Pattern Recognition Algorithm) and 3D-CBS have been proven feasible with current technology by 59 quotes from reputable industries.

  • The 3D-Flow OPRA invention can replace 4,000 CMS electronic data processing boards (goo.gl/mPHw5Y) in physics experiments with 9 electronic data processing boardsgoo.gl/OTkH4z” detailed at “goo.gl/w3XlZ1” while providing an enormous performance improvement at one thousandth the cost.
  • The 3D-CBS can claim to be the first true paradigm change in molecular imaging because it offers at once the three advantages of a) an effective early detection of diseases at a highly curable stage, improved diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring treatments effectively, b) a radiation dose that is 1% of current PET and c) a 4-minute, very low examination cost that will cover all organs of the body. Therefore, individual screening on specific parts of the body, such as mammograms, PAP-tests, colonoscopies and PSA, will not be necessary. (See also the comparison at “goo.gl/tmTZ9O” of the 3D-CBS goo.gl/6DS5oywith the “Explorer Project”: “goo.gl/Tl95NN” or at “goo.gl/ovMZ5j”, funded by NIH for $15.5 million although less efficient, without the ability to save many lives and is more than ten times as expensive as the 3D-CBS). The 3D-CBS invention can reduce cancer deaths by over 50% through an effective early detection while reducing healthcare costs.

Articoli relativi all’invenzione di Crosetto apparsi su giornali in italiano e in inglese.

 

Gli articoli con il titolo in rosso riportano le risposte ai commenti degli esaminatori delle invenzioni 3D-Flow OPRA e 3D-CBS.

 

16° Settimana (10/08/2017): “Crosetto Risponde al Dr. Joel Butler, Spokesperson dell’esperimento CMS al CERN in Merito al 3D-Flow OPRA” . In pdf a: goo.gl/fyYSQK oppure sul Corriere di Saluzzo a: http://www.corrieredisaluzzo.it/cgi-bin/archivio/news/Crosetto-la-diagnosi-precoce-e-vincente16.asp?q=crosetto

 

15° Settimana (3/08/2017): “Crosetto Risponde al Dr. Lankford, Presidente di HEPAP in Merito al 3D-Flow OPRA”. In pdf a: goo.gl/9E3vTf  oppure sul Corriere di Saluzzo a: http://www.corrieredisaluzzo.it/cgi-bin/archivio/news/Crosetto-la-diagnosi-precoce-e-vincente15.asp?q=crosetto    

 

 

14° Settimana (27/07/2017): “Richiesta di Crosetto ad Harvard, MIT e Caltech di Esaminare il Progetto 3D-Flow OPRA e le Sue Risposte agli Esperti del Settore” in pdf a: goo.gl/xhkKYQ oppure sul Corriere di Saluzzo a: http://www.corrieredisaluzzo.it/cgi-bin/archivio/news/Crosetto-la-diagnosi-precoce-e-vincente14.asp?q=crosetto    

 

13° Settimana (20/07/2017): “Dr. Nadia Pastrone Oscilla Sulla Verità Scientifica e Sulla Trasparenza in pdf a: goo.gl/qp1RFH, in HTML a: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2066&lang=it sul Corriere di Saluzzo a:  http://www.corrieredisaluzzo.it/cgi-bin/archivio/news/Crosetto-la-diagnosi-precoce-e-vincente13.asp?q=crosetto    

 

12° Settimana (6/07/2017): “A Difesa del Contribuente e del Malato di Cancro: Sommario Risposta di Crosetto agli Esaminatori dell’Universita’ e INFN di Pavia del Progetto 3D-Flow OPRA”. In pdf a: goo.gl/TvY8Lr oppure sul Corriere di Saluzzo a: http://www.corrieredisaluzzo.it/cgi-bin/archivio/news/Crosetto-la-diagnosi-precoce-e-vincente12.asp?q=crosetto    

 

11° Settimana (28/06/2017): “Risposta Dettagliata di Crosetto agli Esaminatori dell’Universita’ e INFN di Pavia del Progetto 3D-Flow OPRA in pdf a: goo.gl/6N6A59, oppure sul Corriere di Saluzzo a: http://www.corrieredisaluzzo.it/cgi-bin/archivio/news/Crosetto-la-diagnosi-precoce-e-vincente11.asp?q=crosetto    

 

10° Settimana (15/06/2017): “Il Sistema 3D-Flow OPRA Risolve Problemi che non Possono Essere Risolti dai Supercomputers” in pdf a: goo.gl/R9eUZh, oppure sul Corriere di Saluzzo a: http://www.corrieredisaluzzo.it/cgi-bin/archivio/news/Crosetto-la-diagnosi-precoce-e-vincente10.asp?q=crosetto   

 

9° Settimana (08/06/2017): “3D-Flow OPRA: Soluzione a molti Trigger in Experimenti di Fisica delle Alte Energie ed in altre applicazioni” in pdf a: goo.gl/MxNgQT, in HTML a: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2088&lang=it e sul Corriere di Saluzzo a:  http://www.corrieredisaluzzo.it/cgi-bin/archivio/news/Crosetto-la-diagnosi-precoce-e-vincente9.asp?q=crosetto   

 

8° Settimana (01/06/2017): “Il Vero Costo dell’LHC al CERN, Supera i 50 Miliardi di Dollari” in pdf a: goo.gl/7iLtPm, in HTML a: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2084&lang=it e sul Corriere di Saluzzo a: http://www.corrieredisaluzzo.it/cgi-bin/archivio/news/Crosetto-la-diagnosi-precoce-e-vincente8.asp?q=crosetto   

 

7° Settimana (26/05/2017): “La Ricerca Scientifica puo’ Significare un Grande Progresso: Il Ruolo del CERN” in pdf at: goo.gl/BFtNEX, e sul Corriere di Saluzzo a: http://www.corrieredisaluzzo.it/cgi-bin/archivio/news/Crosetto-la-diagnosi-precoce-e-vincente7.asp?q=crosetto   

 

Pubblicato su Facebook: “IL COMPITO DEGLI SCIENZIATI AL CERN E’ QUELLO DI COSTRUIRE STRUMENTI POTENTI E PRECISI CHE SUPERANO I LIMITI DELLA TECNOLOGIA, IN GRADO DI CONFERMARE O ESCLUDERE L’ESISTENZA DI UNA PARTICELLA SUBATOMICA PREVISTA DAI FISICI TEORICI E DI RIVELEARE L’UNIVERSO SCONOSCIUTO. QUESTI STRUMENTI DEVONO ESSERE TESTATI IN UN AMBIENTE CONTROLLATO PER GARANTIRNE LE PRESTAZIONI IN UN AMBIENTE IMPREVEDIBILE CHE NON PUO’ ESSERE CONTROLLATO.” – Dario Crosetto.

 

Supporta la Verita’ Scientifica per il beneficio dell’umanita’ firmando la petizione a https://www.change.org/p/cardiochirurgo-che-lotta-per-la-verita-scientifica-dott-vincenzo-vigna-stop-alla-soppressione-della-tecnologia-salvavita-di-crosetto-chiediamo-un-indagine

 

6° Settimana (18/05/2017): “Soppressione e L’Effetto Semmelweis” http://www.corrieredisaluzzo.it/cgi-bin/archivio/news/Crosetto-la-diagnosi-precoce-e-vincente6.asp?q=crosetto

 

Pubblicato su Facebook: “MOLTE PERSONE, SPECIALMENTE QUELLE IGNORANTI, TI VOGLIONO PUNIRE PER AVER DETTO LA VERITÀ, PER ESSERE STATO LEALE E PER ESSERE TE STESSO. NON SCUSARTI MAI PER ESSERE STATO LEALE O PER ESSERE ANNI AVANTI AL TUO TEMPO. SE SEI NEL GIUSTO E SE LO SAI PARLA LIBERAMENTE. DI QUELLO CHE PENSI. ANCHE SE SEI L’UNICO RAPPRESENTANTE DI UNA MINORANZA, LA VERITÀ È ANCORA LA VERITÀ” – Mahatma Gandhi.

 

Supporta la Verita’ Scientifica per il beneficio dell’umanita’ firmando la petizione a https://www.change.org/p/cardiochirurgo-che-lotta-per-la-verita-scientifica-dott-vincenzo-vigna-stop-alla-soppressione-della-tecnologia-salvavita-di-crosetto-chiediamo-un-indagine

 

5° Settimana (11/05/2017): “Stima del tempo necessario per costruire il 3D-CBS” http://www.corrieredisaluzzo.it/cgi-bin/archivio/news/Crosetto-la-diagnosi-precoce-e-vincente5.asp?q=crosetto

 

Pubblicato su Facebook: “La verita’ non e’ giudizio, ma adesione all’evidenza” -Nicolas Gomez Davila.

 

Supporta la Verita’ Scientifica per il beneficio dell’umanita’ firmando la petizione a https://www.change.org/p/cardiochirurgo-che-lotta-per-la-verita-scientifica-dott-vincenzo-vigna-stop-alla-soppressione-della-tecnologia-salvavita-di-crosetto-chiediamo-un-indagine

 

4° Settimana (04/05/2017): “La Tecnologia 3D-Flow, Massimalizza Economia e Funzionalità” http://www.corrieredisaluzzo.it/cgi-bin/archivio/news/Crosetto-la-diagnosi-precoce-e-vincente4.asp?q=crosetto

 

Pubblicato su Facebook: “PIU’ SI CERCA DI SOPPRIMERE LA VERITA’, PIU’ E’ INEVITABILE CHE TROVERA’ UN MODO PER EMERGERE” -Arianna Huffington.

 

Supporta la Verita’ Scientifica per il beneficio dell’umanita’ firmando la petizione a https://www.change.org/p/cardiochirurgo-che-lotta-per-la-verita-scientifica-dott-vincenzo-vigna-stop-alla-soppressione-della-tecnologia-salvavita-di-crosetto-chiediamo-un-indagine

 

3° Settimana (27/04/2017): “Necessita’ di Divulgare l’invenzione 3D-CBS” Questo documento in italiano in pdf a: goo.gl/2skEcm, in HTML a: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2097&lang=it  e sul Corriere di Saluzzo a: http://www.corrieredisaluzzo.it/cgi-bin/archivio/news/Crosetto-la-diagnosi-precoce-e-vincente3.asp?q=crosetto

 

Pubblicato su Facebook: “PIU’ UNA SOCIETA’ SI ALLONTANA DALLA VERITA’, PIU’ ODIA COLORO CHE NE PARLANO” -George Orwell.

 

Supporta la Verita’ Scientifica per il beneficio dell’umanita’ firmando la petizione a https://www.change.org/p/cardiochirurgo-che-lotta-per-la-verita-scientifica-dott-vincenzo-vigna-stop-alla-soppressione-della-tecnologia-salvavita-di-crosetto-chiediamo-un-indagine

 

2° Settimana (21/04/2017): “Uso Inappropriato dei Soldi dei Contribuenti nella Scienza” http://www.corrieredisaluzzo.it/cgi-bin/archivio/news/Crosetto-la-diagnosi-precoce-e-vincente2.asp?q=crosetto

 

Pubblicato su Facebook: “Chi e’ incurante della Verita’ nelle piccole cose non puo’ avere la fiducia per i problemi piu’ importanti” – Albert Einstein –

 

Supporta la Verita’ Scientifica per il beneficio dell’umanita’ firmando la petizione a https://www.change.org/p/cardiochirurgo-che-lotta-per-la-verita-scientifica-dott-vincenzo-vigna-stop-alla-soppressione-della-tecnologia-salvavita-di-crosetto-chiediamo-un-indagine

 

1° Settimana (13/04/2017): “Crosetto Affronta la Soppressione dei Tempi Moderni” http://www.corrieredisaluzzo.it/cgi-bin/archivio/news/Crosetto-la-diagnosi-precoce-e-vincente.asp

 

13/4/2017. Introduzione alla serie di articoli sul CORRIERE di SALUZZO: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxWfo2ViJ6r5VFpnUHN6WUpsNnc/view?usp=sharing

 

19/01/2017, articolo sul CORRIERE di SALUZZO: http://www.corrieredisaluzzo.it/cgi-bin/archivio/news/La-battaglia-di-Crosetto.asp.

 

07/02/2017, articolo su Piazza Grande: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxWfo2ViJ6r5SlVxQkJGbVplT2s/view?usp=sharing

 

16/12/2014 Affari Italiani: http://www.affaritaliani.it/medicina/dario-crosetto-inventore-della-tecnologia-3d-cbs-diagnosi-precoce-del-cancro161214.html

 

Firma la Petizione: goo.gl/8zLCMh

Appendix C: Copy of your email received today

 

From: Citi® / AAdvantage® Card [mailto:Citicards@info.citibank.com]

Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2017 7:43 AM

To: crosetto@att.net

Subject: Important Account Status Update

 

Security zone: Dario Crosetto

Cardmember since: 1995

 

Account ending in: 9449

Time is Counting Down!

Without a payment your account will charge off. What does that mean?

 

  • Your account will be reported as “charged-off” to the major credit bureau reporting agencies

 

  • Your entire account balance is due and payable immediately

 

  • Your account may be referred to a collections agency or attorney

 

If you are unable to make your payment at this time, we would like you to know that we offer a number of payment solutions to qualifying customers who are experiencing financial difficulty. This is not an offer. We encourage you to chat with us online or call today to discuss whether you may be eligible for one of these solutions.

 

Some of our payment solutions may enable you to, among other things:

 

  • Settle for less than your total balance, payable in up to 3 installments.

 

  • Lower your interest rate.

 

  • Reduce your monthly payment.

 

 

For your convenience, there are two easy ways to manage your account:

 

  • Sign in to CitibankOnline.com to manage your payments or chat with an agent

 

  • Call us at 1-866-544-6447* to speak with an account representative

 

 

Appendix D: Copy of some of the previous correspondence.

 

From: United To End Cancer [mailto:volunteers@u2ec.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 7:36 PM To: Citigroup, Experian…

Subject: No. 186: Dr. Corbat, Dr. Forese, Citigroup BD, please cease actions destroying me and the cancer cause. Investigative journalists, please open an investigation of violations by decision makers in physics and healthcare damaging taxpayers and cancer pa

 

On August 3rd, 2017, I received an additional request from you for $240.73. Did you read my responses to your emails dated July 11 and July 20, 2017?

Please respond and address my concerns listed in this letter instead of asking an additional $240.73, although I have not made any additional purchases of merchandise or services with the credit card since September, 2016.

[No. 186 of this email. Please do not accuse me of harassment before I reach the total number of 800 email as Citigroup’s over 800 phone calls to my cell and home phone and do not take any actions hurting me and my cause, thank you]

This document is available in pdf at Google Drive at: goo.gl/NZE9wU and in HTML at: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2022

 

I am working hard to address this issue beneficial to humanity with the right people. Did You receive the copy of my update sent to scientists expert in the field at MIT?

I respectfully request: please give me a break, please cease actions destroying me and the cancer cause.

############### following is the reference of the email I sent you and experts in the field  #####################

The document sent to CALTECH scientists on July 25, 2017 at 9:14 pm is available in pdf at Google Drive at: goo.gl/atMsXU and in HTML at: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2049

The document sent to MIT scientists on July 25, 2017 at 7:37 am is available in pdf at Google Drive at: goo.gl/2CLTsP and in HTML at: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2044

YOU CAN HELP!

Scientists: by addressing ideas/inventions/projects analytically before construction

Everyone: by supporting transparency in science, Signing the Petition at ‘goo.gl/dzmYCz’

Subject: The breakthrough 3D-Flow OPRA invention has aroused considerable discussion in the scientific community to justify the request by taxpayers for the most prestigious universities to examine my response to experts in the field to accelerate its benefits

############# end of the reference of the email sent this morning ###################

From: Dario Crosetto [mailto:crosetto@att.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 9:09 AM To: ‘”citicards”‘ <172307017layfivciarwxpcqaaaaaawqkhz2ipphahuyaaaaa@info.citibank.com> Cc: see list below Subject: No. 73 RE: Account Alert – View our options to save millions of lives including ours and the one of our grandchildren and future generations

Dear Sir/Madam,

Thank you for your email at the end of this message sent today at 7:39 am.  There is one additional way to address this issue which is more accurate than calling and this is if you ask the recipients of this email to address my concerns below

Your letter dated March 28, 2017 (see below), explains how the government $306 billion, making exceptions to all rules in place, to bail out Citigroup was a good program to avoid hurting many people, but does not express why in your opinion, my compassion to avoid the suffering and needless premature death of many people that induced me to have used my personal credit line for a life-saving invention is not. Please see the report at goo.gl/ivcYPC describing all what I am doing to make the scientific truth for the benefit of humanity and your benefit emerge and prevail. Your letter states: “…The infusion of capital through the TARP; however, does not allow us to lend money to a loss.” At this point, I am not asking to lend money to a loss but to reduce your high profit in fees and interest from $10,708 to $1,390.83 that I have already paid.

Please respond to the above paragraph.

I am answering to your letters, please answer to mine.

Thank you for your attention,

Dario Crosetto

Please read about the hard work reported at goo.gl/ivcYPC that I am doing to make the scientific truth for the benefit of humanity and your benefit emerge and prevail. Please respond and address my concerns listed in this letter instead of asking an additional $154 on July 3, 2017, although I have not made any additional purchases of merchandise or services with the credit card since September, 2016.

June 30, 2017

 

Subject: Dr. Corbat, Dr. Forese, members of Citigroup Board of Directors, please cease actions destroying me and the cause to significantly reduce cancer deaths and cost. Investigative journalists, please urgently open an investigation on violations of laws, rules and ethics by decision makers in particle physics, medical imaging and healthcare damaging taxpayers and cancer patients.

 

Re: Citi/AAdvantage Gold, your customer since 1995. Account ending 9449.

 

Dear Dr. Michael Corbat, CEO of Citigroup, Dear Dr. James Forese, President of Citigroup, Dear G. Stevens, Vice President Citibank, N.A. POB 6077, Dear members of the Board of Directors and the Executive board of Citigroup,

 

Thank you for sending your letter dated June 6, 2017 as a follow up to your letter dated April 17, 2017, where you promised to address my concerns.

 

I regret to read your statements (signed by your representative, the Executive Officer at the Citigroup Office of the President, Ms. Jodi Lang), that you will not stop collections of fees and interests from me to make a high profit from this situation without addressing my concerns. Instead you state: “Such actions may include, but are not limited to, telephone calls being placed, letters and/or emails being sent and forwarding your account to an outside agency for debt collection. We are unable to provide a specific time frame of when such actions may occur.” 

 

I regret that in your letter you did not address my concerns for taxpayer’s wasted hundreds of millions of dollars and for the 8.2 million people dying every year from cancer, knowing that many of them could be saved with my inventions as well as they could reduce the cancer and research economic burden for all of us. Please find my response to Pavia’s University, INFN-CERN reviewers where I am addressing point-by-point their incorrect calculations and claims damaging taxpayers and cancer patients.

 

See my response in pdf at Google Drive at; goo.gl/J9h4qL

and in HTML at: http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2016

 

It can be proven by the calculations from your credit card statements at goo.gl/AlWHvC, that as of February 27, 2017, I paid all my purchases for merchandise and services which were charged to the credit card, even paying an additional amount of $1,390.83.

 

Your request for me to pay an additional $8,837.72 on March 27, 2017, which now you arbitrary increase every month reaching $9,471.18 on July 3, 2017, although I have not made any additional purchases of merchandise or services with the credit card since September, 2016, is for Citigroup to make a high profit from this situation with fees and interest.

 

Your letter dated March 28, 2017 (see below), explains how the government $306 billion to bail out Citigroup was a good program, but does not express why in your opinion, my life-saving invention is not. Your letter states: “…The infusion of capital through the TARP; however, does not allow us to lend money to a loss.” At this point, I am not asking to lend money to a loss but to reduce your high profit in fees and interest from $10,708 to $1,390.83 that I have already paid.

 

I respectfully request not to add any additional actions that are further damaging my cause to significantly reduce cancer deaths and costs with an effective early cancer detection and that are damaging me personally in addition to those that have already damaged my credit score and myself personally because of the violations to laws and rules by a few scientists who do not take responsibility as it is clear from my response to the review goo.gl/J9h4qL.

I respectfully request to give up from making high profit on this case and drop it.

 

Because Citigroup Citi Treasury and Trade Solutions (TTS) intermediates more than $3 trillion in global transactions daily  ̶

 

Because Citigroup’s concerns in 2008 were addressed by the government that shoulder their losses and injected new capital of $306 billion, making exceptions to all rules in place  ̶

 

Because I paid all merchandise and services I charged to my credit card, which were not personal but related to components, computers, printing documents, internet services, software, etc., related to the project to advance science and reduce cancer deaths and costs for the benefit of humanity  ̶

 

Because the fees and interest on my credit card were and continue to be caused by the delay from scientists and funding agencies to address matters of their responsibility (reviewers do not read with attention my documents, articles, innovations as demonstrated at goo.gl/J9h4qL), which are damaging taxpayers and cancer patients, not only for this relatively small amount (which is however, a significant amount and a detrimental action for me as it is destroying me personally, taking away my tools for advancement with my research for the benefit of mankind, destroying my cause to reduce cancer deaths and costs) but for much greater damages in hundreds of millions of taxpayers and lives needlessly lost  ̶

 

Because the fees and interest on my credit cards were and continue to be caused by the violations of laws, rules and professional ethics (see the five bullet points at page 19 of goo.gl/J9h4qL) by a few scientists and decision makers holding positions of responsibility in the field of particle detection, medical imaging and healthcare and because these violations are not reported to the public with an in-depth investigation  ̶

 

Because I cannot solve the cancer problem alone, not even if I am not paid with a salary for 17 years, working constantly with dedication, and because it is unfair to ask me to pay a high profit to Citigroup for over $9,000 in interest and fees while I am working for their benefit, for the benefit of their grandchildren, future generations and humanity because I have considerations to reduce their risk of dying prematurely from cancer with an effective early detection  ̶

 

̶  For the above reasons, including the government considering Citigroup’s concerns in 2008 bailing them out for $306 billion to avoid hurting many people, likewise it is legitimate to ask Citigroup to consider the concerns for the taxpayers robbed by hundreds of millions of dollars and for the people suffering from cancer and for the 8.2 million people dying needlessly every year, knowing that many of them could be saved with my 3D-CBS device for early cancer detection, it is legitimate to ask Citigroup not to make a high profit in fees and interest for over $9,000 on this cause and not destroying me personally by taking my tools, but to leave me in peace.

 

In your letter dated 6/6/2017, you stated: “After further review, it was determined that we have already addressed your concerns. Enclosed are copies of my previous responses to you.” I read those letters thoroughly one by one and could not find anywhere where my concerns were addressed.

 

  • In your letter dated July 27, 2016, my concerns were not addressed. You just repeated the standard rules, not even mentioning the cases where you offer zero interest to the customers, not even explaining why the Citigroup Foundation guideline does not consider supporting the solution for the most deadly and costly calamity with a small percentage. If in 2008, the government instead of addressing your concern, making exceptions to all rules in place and bailing out Citigroup would have ignored all the compelling arguments, Citigroup would have declared bankruptcy and many people would have been hurt.

 

  • In your letter dated August 6, 2016, my concerns for taxpayer’s hundreds of millions of dollars wasted and for the 8.2 million people dying from cancer every year, knowing that many of them could have been saved with my early detection were neither addressed nor mentioned.

 

  • In your letter dated August 31, 2016, my concerns set forth in several letters were not addressed and you informed me that my letters were not even made available to the Citigroup agents who have made since October of 2016 over 700 phone calls. Instead of addressing my concerns you state: “Once again, we respectfully request that you cease sending emails and other correspondence requesting further consideration of funding your medical research or for comments related to the same. …such requests … may be viewed as harassment.” My concerns were neither addressed nor mentioned.

 

  • In your letter dated November 4, 2016, my concerns were not addressed, the standard rules were repeated. Instead of granting zero interest you wrote that: “The APR may be increased up to the variable penalty rate of Prime + 26.74%, (29.99%) … In addition, we …decline your request to place a promotional rate on your account.” You repeat the same sentence regarding denying the request for consideration of my medical research and for being viewed as harassment.

 

  • In your letter dated November 16, 2016, my concerns were not addressed.

 

  • Your letter dated March 28, 2017, explains how the government $306 billion to bail them out was a good program, but does not express why in your opinion, my life-saving invention with the potential to solve the most deadly and costly calamity is not. Your letter states: “In regard to your concern related to the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) of the Government Funding, this program was very helpful because it provided Citi with additional capital that helped us to continue to lend. The infusion of capital through the TARP; however, does not allow us to lend money to a loss.” At this point, I am not asking to lend money to a loss but to reduce your high profit in fees and interest from $10,708 to $1,390.83 that I have already paid. The letter continues repeating the usual sentence to cease requesting addressing my concerns about the taxpayer money and lives needlessly lost or for comments related to the same. …such requests … may be viewed as harassment.

 

This report of the content of your letters makes clear that not only you have not addressed my concerns as you stated in your most recent letter dated 6/6/2017, but your letter asked me repeatedly not to ask to address my concerns for the taxpayer money wasted and the millions of people dying needlessly that both could be saved with my money- and life-saving inventions.

 

Please let’s reflect on the legitimacy of your request that I should not ask to address my concerns for the damage to taxpayer and cancer patients, the appropriateness of your actions of going after me, destroying me and my cause of working for you, your grandchildren, and future generation to significantly reducing your risk of dying prematurely from cancer, your ordering to an outside agency to collect from me a high profit for Citigroup of $10,708 in fees and interest which could take away my tools impeding me to conduct my research.

 

This is despite Citigroup profits from over $3 trillion transaction daily, they recognized in the letter 3/28/2017 very helpful that the Government understood Citigroup concerns in 2008 and injected $306 billion cash to help them continue to lend and realizing that Citigroup’s justification that they are not allowed “to lend money to a loss” does not apply to my case because I paid all my purchases with the credit card and gave an additional $1,390.83 to Citigroup, therefore this case is not a loss for them and in addition I proved that a few scientists and government agencies (responsible to address my innovations more cost-effective with respect to the projects they were funding, violated laws, rules, and professional ethics by not responding), were responsible for the delays that caused the fees and interests on the credit card.

 

As an analogy, let’s suppose every day person A takes his dog for a walk with a very short leash almost strangling the dog by a narrow collar because person A pulls the leash making the dog walk only on his two back feet and kicking repeatedly his dog under the belly and person B moved by compassion express his concerns toward the non-considered treatment of the dog.

 

Person A does not address person B concerns, he tries instead to hurt person B by reporting to the neighbors, to the police etc. that he is harassed by person B. Furthermore, person A tries to destroy person B personally, so he will not receive the concerned statements about his dog.

 

Is it legitimate for person B continue to be concerned for the dog and because there is a solution for the dog being treated with consideration, he continues to express his concerns to his owner, person A and to anyone who could help?

 

In my situation, moved by compassion, I worked hard with dedication and commitment with no salary for 17 years because I am concerned for the taxpayers robbed by hundreds of millions of dollars and for the 8.2 million people dying every year from cancer knowing that many of them could be saved with my 3D-CBS (3-D Complete Body Screening) invention effective for early cancer detection and also cost-effective to save taxpayer money.

 

Rather than all actions to suppress my concerns, Citigroup could express their thoughts, provide their supporting material that would allow scientists and experts in the field respond and together workout compromises that best satisfy Citigroup’s role and mission, maximizing at the same time the benefits to their customers.

 

The following are a few examples of possible responses to my concerns with reasons that would begin a dialogue so that the explanations and verification of the supporting material of different claims from different parties will lead to address this problem with consideration as the Government addressed Citigroup’s concerns in 2008.

 

  1. For example, the reason why Citigroup is not addressing Crosetto’s concerns hurting the public as the Government addressed Citigroup’s concerns hurting the public in 2008 could be (or is) because it is Citigroup’s opinion that Crosetto is wrong, together with Gina Kolata from the New York Times reporting only 5% cancer mortality rate reduction in the past 50 years while for the same period for strokes was 74%, for flu and pneumonia was 58%, and those who claim that cancer is the most deadly and costly calamity in the world are all wrong. As well it is Citigroup’s opinion that all scientists, including the members of the panel of a formal, official, public scientific review held at FERMILAB in 1993 who recognized Crosetto’s 3D-Flow invention capable of filtering the background noise and identifying any sought-after particle were all wrong.

 

If this is the case, Citigroup will then provide their supporting evidence, data and facts proving that it is not true that 8.2 million people are dying of cancer every year, 7 million of whom younger than 75 years of age. They will also join the request by other people for a public meeting at CERN between Crosetto who can point out the flaws in the trigger systems and others who claim that it is not true that CERN CMS Level-1 Trigger (“The Trap”) costing over one hundred million dollars (and those of other experiments) does not have the capability to filter background noise and identify the sought-after particle (although their CMS Level-1 Trigger system was trashed on February 26, 2016).

 

Scientists will analyze data, facts and scientific evidence of both parties. They will report the Q&A at CERN between Crosetto and the opponents of his inventions and publish the results.

 

  1. And/or the reason why Citigroup is not addressing Crosetto’s concerns hurting the public as the Government addressed Citigroup’s concerns hurting the public in 2008 could be (or is) because it is Citigroup’s opinion that Crosetto is wrong, together with all those who provide experimental data proving that early detection saves lives. They believe drugs for late detection are working and saving lives and research funding should mainly be spent in developing new drugs attempting to cure cancer when detected at a late stage, which is exactly what funding agencies are doing now. Citigroup with others believe that the size of the market of drugs such as Avastin that in 2012 sold $6.3 billion is the proof of success. The fact that in average prolonged life over a ten-year study for those who used Avastin of only 2.4 months might be justified by someone that soon or later we have to die. Crosetto believes that success of an approach/procedure/project is when experimental data shows the reduction of cancer mortality rate in a sample population.

 

If this is the case, Citigroup will then provide their supporting evidence, data and facts proving drugs developed for and used at late cancer stage work. Crosetto will provide experimental data proving that when a tumor is detected at an early stage has the probability to save the patient’s life for more than 50% of the cases.

 

Scientists will analyze data, facts and scientific evidence of both parties and publish the results.

 

  1. And/or the reason why Citigroup is not addressing Crosetto’s concerns hurting the public as the Government addressed Citigroup’s concerns hurting the public in 2008 could be (or is) because it is Citigroup’s opinion that Crosetto is wrong stating that sensitivity should be improved in PET (Positron Emission Tomography) rather than spatial resolution to the detriment of sensitivity as are doing the other scientists who receive grants from Government funding agencies.

 

If this is the case, Citigroup will then provide their supporting evidence, data and facts proving spatial resolution in PET is more important than sensitivity and it can be improved to the detriment of sensitivity. Crosetto will prove that the principle of operation of the Positron Emission Technology is similar to tachometer measuring the miles per hour, an anemometer measuring the air flow within a unit of time, likewise PET should focus in accurately measuring the minimum anomaly in biological processes within a unit of time in the human body.

 

Scientists will analyze data, facts and scientific evidence of both parties and publish the results.

 

  1. And/or the reason why Citigroup is not addressing Crosetto’s concerns hurting the public as the Government addressed Citigroup’s concerns hurting the public in 2008 could be (or is) because it is Citigroup’s opinion that Crosetto is wrong in stating that results should be measured on a sample population showing a reduction in mortality rate on 10,000 or 100,000 people every year.

 

If this is the case, Citigroup will then provide their supporting evidence, data and facts proving a few miracle cases of people who survived cancer with a high increase in cancer business that in their opinion is proving success. Crosetto will provide experimental data proving a reduction of cancer deaths and costs on a sample population by screening 10,000 people per year on each 3D-CBS (3-D Complete Body Screening) innovative technology which can also improve diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring treatments with a device hundreds of times more efficient than current over 10,000 PET (Positron Emission Tomography), requiring 1% the radiation dosage and covering all organs of the body in a single 4 minute examination. Hence screening on specific organs such as: mammography, PAP-test, colonoscopy, and PSA will be superfluous.

 

Scientists will analyze data, facts and scientific evidence of both parties and publish the results.

 

The ones above are examples of Citigroup expressing their ideas addressing my concerns which ultimately will clarify that it is Citigroup opinion that this issue is not of their concern to be addressed as the Government addressed Citigroup’s concerns in 2008 because they do not believe there are 8.2 million cancer deaths per year, they do not care or they do not believe my innovations can greatly contribute to a significant reduction of cancer deaths and costs.

 

Citigroup did not address my concern as it was stated in your letter dated June 6, 2017. After my concerns will be addressed, I could provide a response similar to the one I provided to the scientists at goo.gl/J9h4qL

 

In light of all of the above and because of my hard work in answering all objections to the opponents of my inventions that could greatly contribute to advance science and reduce cancer deaths and costs, it is legitimate for me to respectfully ask Citigroup not to make a high profit in fees and interest for over $9,000 on this cause and not destroying me personally by taking my tools, but to leave me in peace.

 

Thank you,

 

Sincerely,

 

Dario Crosetto

900 Hideaway Place

DeSoto, TX 75115.  –  Email: crosettodario@gmail.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Site Overview
Please visit our
Site Overview for help in navigating the site.
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Upcoming Events
November 2019
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
October 28, 2019 October 29, 2019 October 30, 2019 October 31, 2019 November 1, 2019 November 2, 2019 November 3, 2019
November 4, 2019 November 5, 2019 November 6, 2019 November 7, 2019 November 8, 2019 November 9, 2019 November 10, 2019
November 11, 2019 November 12, 2019 November 13, 2019 November 14, 2019 November 15, 2019 November 16, 2019 November 17, 2019
November 18, 2019 November 19, 2019 November 20, 2019 November 21, 2019 November 22, 2019 November 23, 2019 November 24, 2019
November 25, 2019 November 26, 2019 November 27, 2019 November 28, 2019 November 29, 2019 November 30, 2019 December 1, 2019