The Future is in Our Hands
Blog
Information, Awareness, Prevention / United to End Cancer

This document is available in pdf at: goo.gl/iUybdj

Dear All, On behalf of the over 7,000 cancer patients and those who signed the petition who care to address this cancer problem truthfully and honestly, I request the staff of journalismfund.eu to provide answers and actions consistent with the mission statement and the declarations stated on their website and also stated by their founders of journalismfund.eu.

I just had a conversation with Ms. Lisa May, she stated that she sent me a message on May 19, 2017 to my email address informing me that my pitch-page was approved and sent to the journalists at the conference.

I pointed out that on May 30, 2017 (see a copy below) I received instead a message from her (as the moderator of the dataharvest database) stating the opposite that my pitch-page was not sent because I am not a member.

I pointed out that I never received the email from her stating that my pitch-page was sent to the journalists. It would be a contradiction receiving one email stated that my pitch-page was sent and another email stating that it was not sent because I am not a member. My status did not change in a few days from being a member to not being a member.  I asked her to resend me copy of her email that she claimed sending me on May 19, 2017 and she did not have such email.

Ms. May hang the phone conversation.

On behalf of the over 7,000 cancer patients and those who signed the petition who care to address this cancer problem truthfully and honestly, I request the staff of journalismfund.eu to provide answers and actions consistent with the mission statement and the declarations stated on their website and also stated by their founders of journalismfund.eu.

 

Thank you,

 

Kind Regards,

 

Dario Crosetto

 

 

From: Dario Crosetto [mailto:crosetto@att.net] Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 12:18 AM To: ‘ides.debruyne@journalismfund.eu’ <ides.debruyne@journalismfund.eu>; ‘brigitte.alfter@journalismfund.eu’ <brigitte.alfter@journalismfund.eu>; ‘lisa.may@journalismfund.eu’ <lisa.may@journalismfund.eu>; ‘administration@journalismfund.eu’ <administration@journalismfund.eu> Cc: ‘unitedtoendcancer@att.net’ <unitedtoendcancer@att.net>; ‘unitedtoendcancer2@gmail.com’ <unitedtoendcancer2@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Need to be connected to an investigative journalist in Europe, WE CANNOT ACCEPT THE CONSEQUENCES OF SUPPRESSING FOR 40 YEARS INVENTIONS TO SAVE LIVES AND TAXPAYER/DONATION MONEY

 

Dear All,

 

I spoke on the phone with Ms. Lisa May on Wednesday September 6 and thanked her for removing the block from my phone to your phone number +32 2 705 59 29, however, I still could not call the direct line at +32 2 726 97 88.

 

Ms. May also told me that she is the moderator of the dataharvest database and she receives orders from Ides Debruyne. In my case she did not receive the order to send out my pitch-page.

 

Ms. May told me to call Thursday afternoon to talk to Ides Debruyne, I called and I talk to Ms. Linda Berckmans who told me to call on Friday afternoon before 5:00 pm to talk to Ides Debruyne.

 

Please find attached the article published today in English (also available at goo.gl/4Nn2jS) and it will be published Saturday in Italian.

 

Please provide a convenient time for a phone call with a representative from journalismfund.eu to address the content of my letter and to prepare a pitch-page to the satisfaction of journalismfund.eu.

 

Thank you,

 

Kind Regards,

 

Dario Crosetto

 

From: Dario Crosetto [mailto:crosetto@att.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 9:04 AM To: ‘ides.debruyne@journalismfund.eu’ <ides.debruyne@journalismfund.eu>; ‘brigitte.alfter@journalismfund.eu’ <brigitte.alfter@journalismfund.eu>; ‘lisa.may@journalismfund.eu’ <lisa.may@journalismfund.eu>; ‘administration@journalismfund.eu’ <administration@journalismfund.eu> Cc: ‘unitedtoendcancer@att.net’ <unitedtoendcancer@att.net>; ‘unitedtoendcancer2@gmail.com’ <unitedtoendcancer2@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Need to be connected to an investigative journalist in Europe, WE CANNOT ACCEPT THE CONSEQUENCES OF SUPPRESSING FOR 40 YEARS INVENTIONS TO SAVE LIVES AND TAXPAYER/DONATION MONEY

 

Dear All,

 

Please could you provide a convenient time for a phone call with a representative from journalismfund.eu?

 

Thank you for removing the block on the phone +32 2 705 59 29. I called this morning and left a message. However, the block to my phone number still exist on your direct line +32 2 726 97 88. I still receive the message in French from that number stating “This call is not authorized when originated from your connection”.

 

Thank you,

Kind Regards,

 

Dario Crosetto

 

Dear Ides, Director of Journalismfund.eu,

 

Perhaps you are not aware that I have been working long days for over 18 years without a salary, including most of the weekends for your benefit, the benefit of your grandchildren, and for future generations in reducing cancer deaths by over 50% with my breakthrough technology for an effective early cancer detection, and that it damages you and more importantly all other people who rely on your responsibility if you are not reporting to journalists that you know and to the public my answers to those opposing my money- and life-saving inventions.

 

Perhaps you or your colleagues who blocked my phone number and do not answer my emails have overlooked this case where on behalf of taxpayers and cancer patients who are damaged from billions of dollars and millions of lives needlessly lost, I legitimately request you and the journalists you know to inform the public about the statements of the scientists and leaders opposing my money- and life-saving inventions and my answers to them either by publishing the complete original answers available at goo.gl/yyJhFG or a summary of my answers to each leader with the link to the full document. (It will also be useful to provide the readers the link to my answers to all questions I received regarding my breakthrough inventions goo.gl/XtMkJc).

 

When scientists holding positions of high responsibility, who are trusted by the public to be top experts in the field, recant their statements without providing a reason (Lankford goo.gl/8jaxDH, goo.gl/EJpKyq; Butler goo.gl/ZJh0Kg, goo.gl/k46ea6; or wavers on scientific truth and transparency like Pastrone, goo.gl/iEph5R), and when 59 quotes from reputable companies prove my invention can replace 4,000 electronic boards (goo.gl/mPHw5Y) with 9 of my 3D-Flow OPRA boards (goo.gl/OTkH4z detailed at goo.gl/w3XlZ1), while providing enormous performance increase at one thousandth the cost, and prove its superiority these past two decades compared to alternative more expensive and less efficient funded systems (see pages 102-117 of ‘goo.gl/w3XlZ1), and had my inventions been used in the 3D-CBS (3-D Complete Body Screening) medical imaging (see trifold at “goo.gl/YcAJDy“, more information at “goo.gl/JMKyek) could have already saved millions of lives through an effective early cancer detection, isn’t it your professional duty to investigate and reveal the truth beneficial to taxpayers and cancer patients and have breakthrough innovations emerge together with all damages you, your grandchildren and humanity continue to be affected because innovations are suppressed?

 

I have been very patient and respectful to you for the past six months, and will continue to be, however, it is clear you have not understood that you are overlooking this case causing disrespectful, unethical behavior mainly affecting taxpayers and cancer patients. Perhaps you believe that overlooking this case is just disrespectful to me, but instead, because my legitimate questions are on behalf of taxpayers and cancer patients, the disrespect and greater damage from your behavior and actions are mainly affecting them.

 

My phone calls and emails are an attempt to help you fulfill the mission stated in many documents and the website of your organization. If you or your colleagues block my phone calls and do not respond to my emails, I am forced to address in the public blog at http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?cat=20 whatever is pertinent and legitimate with respect to your responsibilities which, as you explained to me, is to filter the information and pass it on to the hundreds of journalists you invite at the conferences you organize and those you and your organization can reach through your dataharvest database. (During a long phone conversation on May 29, 2017, with Ides, he explained his role to be the person responsible to take the decision about what is “RELEVANT” and what is not for an investigation in the public interest. Also, he is the one who sets priorities).

 

I hope that you will understand that I do not have anything personal against you, but I am defending the interest of taxpayers and cancer patients. Because they ask me to contact organizations like yours that publicly declare to pursue justice and defend their interest, I need to make them aware of what I wrote and discussed with you and report the answers I received from you. I will continue to read the public statements of your and other organizations, and professionally submit pertinent, legitimate requests that are in agreement with the declared mission and objectives of your organization. As long as you are the Director of journalismfund.eu, I will submit them to your name and to your attention. The day you are replaced by someone else, I will submit requests to the person replacing you and will respect your desire not to be contacted via email or phone. Following is a summary of what I am reporting to taxpayers and cancer patients, which reflects the content of pages of emails and a few phone calls.

 

There were no excessive phone calls during the past six months. I never received a call back promised by you and my subsequent phone calls were in agreement with you to either call you back or a promise of some kind of information/feedback from you that I never received. We first spoke on the phone on February 2017, then I spoke with you on 5/16/17 for 9 minutes, on 5/23/17 for 2 minutes, on 5/24//17 for 5 minutes, on 5/29/17 for 38 minutes.  I received no answer to my call on 6/1/17, and on 7/13/17, I was told that you were on vacation for three weeks. On 8/31/17, I received the first automatic voice message that a phone call from my phone number was not allowed and a second message the next day verified that my phone number had been blocked.  I called from another phone and spoke with your assistant who told me that she did not know which numbers you had blocked.

 

I followed up by contacting the two journalists you had suggested and those suggested by one of those journalists. I will also be reporting to taxpayers and cancer patients the answers I received from them.

 

–          On March 13, 2017, you suggested I contact Ms. Cecilia Anesi at IRPI and Hristio Boytchev at the German CORRECTIV. I contacted both.

 

–          On March 13, 2017, you responded that “Both are used to push their stories all over Europe. Both can coordinate an international investigation. They did that already in the past. They aren’t focused on Italy or Germany only.”

 

–          On March 29, 2017, I responded:

o   “Cecilia Anesi never replied. I contacted her with emails in English on February 24, 2017 at her address info@irpi.eu and on March 13, 2017 with a message in Italian at cecilia.anesi@gmail.com.

o   Hristio Boytchev answered my email. He asked some questions to which I answered and he found them satisfactory. However, then he wrote a message stating “Unfortunately, we don’t have the resources right now that would be necessary to cover your story” (It was my understanding that your organization “journalismfund.eu” is funding journalists to cover valuable stories. I was puzzle why you provided Hristio’s name if you did not intend to fund him for this investigation).   Hristio suggested Philipp Hummel who also stated “this topic doesn’t really fall into my field of work.”

 

–          On May 17, 2017, you wrote to me: “You can pitch it here: http://www.journalismfund.eu/mailinglist. One thing: you have to pitch it properly. Nobody will read long reads. So If you can, put it on a short A4.” I prepared the page suggested by you and immediately submitted it to the dataharvest-owner@list.journalismfund.eu, sending also a copy to you because the following day you were meeting about 400 journalists at the conference that you organized at Mechelen, in Belgium from May 18 to 21, promising to personally describe my case to some journalists who you know.

 

–          On May 30, 2017, when your conference with 380 journalists was over, I received information from you that you did not talk about my case to any journalist as you had promised during our phone conversation, and I received the message from the moderator that my one-page pitch was not received by the 380 journalists at the conference because it was rejected by the moderator (him) with the reason: “Non-members are not allowed to post messages to this list.” I explained to the moderator (sending also a copy of my email to you) that I was invited by you, the Director of journalismfund.eu, to submit that page. However, you did not overrule the moderator’s rejection telling him that you are a member of the dataharvest and you asked me to submit one-page pitch.

 

–          All promises from you over the phone to address this issue were not met, and while making my first call after more than one month on August 31, 2017, I discovered that you or your colleagues had blocked my phone number.

 

Because there are proofs that my inventions could have replaced 4,000 electronic boards with 9 of my 3D-Flow OPRA boards, while providing enormous performance improvement at one thousandth the cost, because it made computers more capable before the deaths of Moore’s law (goo.gl/2CLTsP), and when used in the 3D-CBS (3-D Complete Body Screening) technology has the potential to save millions of lives with an effective early cancer detection, it is my responsibility to address this to people holding positions of responsibility in the media like you.

 

As stated by the Investigative agency, Reveal- Center for Investigative Reporting: “We must take science out of the labs and journals, and share it with the world”, it is the responsibility of people like you to inform the journalists and the public about the contradicting, non-scientific statements of some scientists. You and the journalists do not have to take sides or judge whether one scientist is right or wrong, as the contradicting, unethical, dishonest statements that are inconsistent with science made by some scientists will expose them.

 

Suppressing the dialogue between scientists has been the cause of needless deaths of millions of people and it is outrageous to humanity that for two decades my inventions which have been recognized valuable by academia, industry and research centers in a public, international, scientific review (goo.gl/zP76Tc), proven feasible and functional in hardware, proven feasible by 59 quotes from reputable industries continue have been suppressed because some decision-makers in the field use taxpayer money to fund less efficient and more costly projects and the media are not providing this information to the public to uncover the truth of the unethical, dishonest actions of these few decision-makers.

 

I trust that you will provide a considerate answer to my legitimate request to work together on the one-page pitch to send to the journalists you know so they can inform the public about the statements of the scientists and leaders opposing my money- and life-saving inventions and my answers to them either by publishing the complete original answers available at goo.gl/yyJhFG or a summary of my answers to each leader with the link to the full document.

 

Sincerely,

 

Dario Crosetto

President of the Crosetto Foundation for the Reduction of Cancer Deaths

900 Hideaway Pl.

DeSoto, TX 75115

Email: crosettodario@gmail.com

 

 

 

Following is a copy of the correspondence on behalf of taxpayers and cancer patients to serve their interest

####################################

—–Original Message—– From: United To End Cancer [mailto:volunteers@u2ec.org] Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 10:34 AM To: ‘dataharvest-owner@lists.journalismfund.eu’ <dataharvest-owner@lists.journalismfund.eu>; ‘ides.debruyne@journalismfund.eu’ <ides.debruyne@journalismfund.eu> Cc: ‘crosettodario@gmail.com’ <crosettodario@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Request to mailing list Dataharvest rejected

 

Dear Ides and the moderator of the dataharvest list,

 

Were you able to send out to the list of 380 journalists the one page pitch that Ides asked me to prepare?

 

This pitch consists of:

– two lines title which describes the problem/corruption/damage to the public

– Four line subtitle which further describe the problem/corruption/damage to the public

– nine paragraphs which further describe the problem/corruption/damage to the public with six links for a more in-depth study if desired

– one line with my contact information and link to my curriculum vitae and credential

– fifteen lines fine print only as a service to journalists in providing a description of the essence of the problem and how is solved by my invention in the event the journalists are interested in a more in-depth study and with additional five links to supporting material

– two bullet points in fine print summarizing the disruptive advantages and benefits of my inventions compared to existing approaches in physics applications and in medical imaging applications with additional seven links to serve the journalist interested in a more in-depth study.

 

The page is structured in a way that the journalist can stop reading at any line, however, as Ides promised me, on behalf of taxpayers and cancer patients who are deprived for more than a decade from the benefits from my inventions, I am expecting to receive the reasons provided by the investigative journalists to Ides why they are not interested to open an investigation on the damages to taxpayers, cancer patients and humanity on the corruption and clear actions violating laws, rules, ethics by many people on the world’s most deadly and costly calamity, cancer and on the most expensive experiment in the history of the planet at CERN.

 

I have been dealing with this question with Ides since February 2017 and now i think that in his position as the Director of the journalismfund who can reach the over 400 journalists, he has the responsibility to provide an answer to taxpayers and cancer patients that I will pass it on.

 

The time for this answer is making it overdue as days pass by. During my last phone contact with Ides, he asked for two to three additional days which brings to the deadline of today.

Would you please provide the answer you received by contacting over 400 journalists who read my one page pitch?

 

Thank you,

 

Kind Regards,

 

Dario Crosetto

President of the Crosetto Foundation for the reduction of Cancer Deaths

900 Hideaway Pl.

DeSoto, TX 75115

Email. crosettodario@gmail.com

 

 

##############################

—–Original Message—–

From: United To End Cancer [mailto:volunteers@u2ec.org]

Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 11:11 AM

To: ‘dataharvest-owner@lists.journalismfund.eu’ <dataharvest-owner@lists.journalismfund.eu>

Cc: ‘ides.debruyne@journalismfund.eu’ <ides.debruyne@journalismfund.eu>; ‘unitedtoendcancer@att.net’ <unitedtoendcancer@att.net>

Subject: RE: Request to mailing list Dataharvest rejected

 

Dear Moderator of the dataharvest-owner@lists.journalismfund.eu account,

 

Thank you for letting me know that my one page pitch requested by Ides did not reach the 380 recipients, also for giving me the opportunity to address this issue.

 

I am treating you with respect because I assume you are working to implement the mission stated in your website and shared by all professionals who placed their name on that website.

 

If your actions are against this implementation and against to what is declared by the people who placed their names in your website, this is your self-injury to your mission, destroying the credential of your organization and the work of your colleagues. Your colleagues should know and people should know.

 

Besides that, I was invited by the Director of Journalismfund to prepare a page pitch and send it to that email (you knew that this was the case because I specified it in the subject line), which that alone makes your rejection invalid, however, even if there would not have been the invitation from the Director of journalismfund please explain how anyone in the world can inform investigative journalists about corruptions damaging the public, etc.? Who is deciding which investigation case is more worthwhile than another instead of freely letting each individual investigative journalist decide which one is more important?

 

During a long phone conversation yesterday with Ides apparently he is the person responsible to take this decision about what is “RELAVANT”  and what is not for an investigation in the public interest. Also he is the one who sets priorities.

 

As a courtesy and respect, I am trying to resolve this issue with a dialogue to make sure that you stand behind your words on behalf of all the members of journalism funds and his Director. Ultimately, if this is your position I will have to inform about the response I received from journalismfund and publish it on my blog in HTML and as a back up I also publish it on Google Drive in PDF which has less chance to be obscured than a website.

 

Please let me know your final response and please ask Ides to share my email with him.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Dario Crosetto

 

##########################################

—–Original Message—–

From: Dataharvest [mailto:dataharvest-bounces@lists.journalismfund.eu] On Behalf Of dataharvest-owner@lists.journalismfund.eu

Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 8:08 AM

To: volunteers@u2ec.org

Subject: Request to mailing list Dataharvest rejected

 

Your request to the Dataharvest mailing list

 

Posting of your message titled “RE: The Managing Director,      Ides

Debruyne of the Journalismfund invited me to send to the 380

participants at The European Investigative Journalism     Conference &

Dataharvest 2017,            one page A4 pitch of my very important cause  ”

 

has been rejected by the list moderator.  The moderator gave the following reason for rejecting your request:

 

“Non-members are not allowed to post messages to this list.”

 

Any questions or comments should be directed to the list administrator

at:

 

dataharvest-owner@lists.journalismfund.eu

 

#################################

From: Crosetto Dario [mailto:crosettodario@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 2:41 AM To: ‘kristof.clerix@knack.be’ <kristof.clerix@knack.be> Cc: ‘ides.debruyne@fondspascaldecroos.org’ <ides.debruyne@fondspascaldecroos.org> Subject: Dear Kristof, thank you for your feedback through Ides…

 

Dear Kristof,

 

Thank you for your feedback through Ides about my page pitch that Ides asked me to prepare.

 

I am sorry to hear that you did not read it because there was too much information.

 

Here is the link goo.gl/9KzNJ6

 

I will appreciate if we start step by step and you will comment about

 

  1. The two lines title
  2. The four lines subtitle
  3. The nine paragraphs
  4. The hyperlinks in the nine paragraph
  5. The fine print providing more details in the event you need supporting arguments
  6. The links within the fine print
  7. The last two bullet point that describes the disruptive advantages of my inventions in two applications: physics and medical imaging

 

I am looking forward receiving your comments critique that will allow me to improve communicating this subject to you.

 

Kind Regards,

Dario

 

############################################

From: United To End Cancer [mailto:volunteers@u2ec.org] Sent: Monday, May 29, 2017 10:47 AM To: ‘ides.debruyne@fondspascaldecroos.org’ <ides.debruyne@fondspascaldecroos.org> Subject: RE: Citigroup Board of Directors, Decision Makers and journalists working together to demand and implement transparency in science and eliminate the suppression of innovations

 

Ides,

 

I was very much surprised for your email. Last week you promised that you will give me a feedback from Clerix about the title, subtitle and nine paragraphs you asked me to provide to you.

 

Your answer is that he is not going to read them.

 

Is it the correct protocol that I should inform the public that Clerix and all the other investigative journalists you have contacted are not interested to read one title, the subtitle and nine paragraphs?

 

During our recent phone conversation we came to the conclusion that the key point to clarify is what is “RELEVANT” or not for an investigative journalist. They have thousands of cases they can work on, how do they make a priority to those more important to serve the public?

 

Below is the email I sent you last week and I will appreciate receiving your response.

 

Kind Regards,

Dario

 

##########################################################

From: ides.debruyne@fondspascaldecroos.org [mailto:ides.debruyne@fondspascaldecroos.org] Sent: Monday, May 29, 2017 7:51 AM To: United To End Cancer <volunteers@u2ec.org> Subject: Re: Citigroup Board of Directors, Decision Makers and journalists working together to demand and implement transparency in science and eliminate the suppression of innovations

 

Is it possible to stop this emails? You send me the last 3 days 7 emails of this kind. This more than spam and works contra productive.

 

thanks,

 

Ides

 

Op 26 mei 2017, om 10:55 heeft United To End Cancer <volunteers@u2ec.org> het volgende geschreven:

 

[This document is available in PDF at Google Drive at goo.gl/qVubjR]

The document to scientists is available in PDF at Google Drive at goo.gl/JjnM2U and in HTML at http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2010

Subject: RE: Dr. Butler, Dr. Lankford, Dr. Pastrone, & Decision Makers, …regarding: SCIENTIST IMPOSES TWO THINGS upon himself and upon other scientists, NAMELY TRUTH AND SINCERITY

 

Dear Citigroup member of the Board of Directors and Decision Makers,

_____________________________________________ From: Gerspach, John C [mailto:john.c.gerspach@citi.com]  Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 6:57 PM To: United To End Cancer S <science4me@blog.u2ec.org> Subject: Read: RE: Letter to Citigroup, Decision Makers and journalists working together to demand and implement transparency in science and eliminate the suppression of innovations

Your message

To: Gerspach, John C [CCC]

Subject: RE: Letter to Citigroup,    Decision Makers and journalists working together to demand and  implement transparency in science and eliminate the suppression of innovations

Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 7:28:59 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

was read on Monday, May 22, 2017 7:56:35 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

_____________________________________________ From: Fraser, Jane [mailto:jane.fraser@citi.com]  Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 6:39 PM To: United To End Cancer S <science4me@blog.u2ec.org> Subject: Read: RE: Letter to Citigroup, Decision Makers and journalists working together to demand and implement transparency in science and eliminate the suppression of innovations

Your message

To: Fraser, Jane [ICG-CORP]

Subject: RE: Letter to Citigroup,    Decision Makers and journalists working together to demand and  implement transparency in science and eliminate the suppression of innovations

Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 7:28:59 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

was read on Monday, May 22, 2017 7:38:55 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

_____________________________________________ From: Volk, Stephen [mailto:stephen.volk@citi.com]  Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 6:36 PM To: United To End Cancer S <science4me@blog.u2ec.org> Subject: Read: RE: Letter to Citigroup, Decision Makers and journalists working together to demand and implement transparency in science and eliminate the suppression of innovations

Your message

To: Volk, Stephen [ICG-CORP]

Subject: RE: Letter to Citigroup,    Decision Makers and journalists working together to demand and  implement transparency in science and eliminate the suppression of innovations

Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 7:28:59 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

was read on Monday, May 22, 2017 7:36:22 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

_____________________________________________ From: Bird, Stephen [mailto:stephen.bird@citi.com]  Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 4:01 PM To: United To End Cancer S <science4me@blog.u2ec.org> Subject: Read: RE: Letter to Citigroup, Decision Makers and journalists working together to demand and implement transparency in science and eliminate the suppression of innovations

Your message

To: Bird, Stephen [GCB]

Subject: RE: Letter to Citigroup,    Decision Makers and journalists working together to demand and  implement transparency in science and eliminate the suppression of innovations

Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 4:37:01 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

was read on Monday, May 22, 2017 5:00:35 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

————————————————————————–

I see that you read my email dated May 22, 2017 and you are therefore aware that Citigroup agents deceived me and those benefitting of my inventions: taxpayers, cancer patients and humanity, by making me believe they were addressing my concerns first described in my letter dated April 14, 2017 (goo.gl/4LP2rF) and later on May 5, 2017 (goo. gl/H0ycXn) as it was stated in the letter dated April 17, 2017, (goo.gl/NPpdZF) sent from the Office of the President of Citigroup. Instead they reported me to the credit bureau making my 834 score that took me 26 year to build, plunging to 627.

 

I respectfully request you acknowledge via email that you are not starting the collection procedure on May 27, 2017 of my tools: table, chair, computers, oscilloscopes, Logic State Analyzer, power supplies, etc. and that you will address one-by-one all seven points of the concerns I listed below in the letter that your read on May 22, 2017. Please ask your agents at Citigroup to STOP hurting me and my cause. Please ask them to give up coming after me, to STOP a collection procedure on May 27, 2017.

 

Dear decision makers, leaders in the field, investigative journalists and those who care to make the scientific truth for the benefit of humanity prevail, we should work together to demand and implement transparency in science (please see APPEDIX for references to information supporting these claims.

 

To solve Citigroup problem and many other problems of stopping wasting hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayer money and the needless loss of millions of people from cancer that could be save with an effective early cancer detection provided by my invention, I respectfully request you (decision makers, leaders in the field, investigative journalists and those who care…) write an email to Andy Lankford, ajlankfo@uci.edu, Joel Butler, joel.butler@cern.ch,  and Nadia Pastrone, nadia.pastrone@cern.ch, asking them to organize a public discussion/review of my inventions at CERN and stated in a letter from CERN Director General on February 2nd, 2017. This public scientific review of my 3D-Flow OPRA invention similar to the one Andrew Lankford and Joel Butler organized in 1993 at FERMILAB on my previous basic 3D-Flow invention, which was recognized valuable, is long overdue.

 

Sincerely,

 

Dario Crosetto

 

 

###################################

From: ides.debruyne@journalismfund.eu [mailto:ides.debruyne@journalismfund.eu]

Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 1:57 AM

To: United To End Cancer <volunteers@u2ec.org>

Subject: Re: I respectfully request you address the proof that my invention can replace 4, 000 electronic data processing boards with my 9 electronic data processing boards while providing an enormous performance improvement at one thousandth the cost

 

Hi Dario,

 

Best,

 

Ides

 

#########################################

From: Dario Crosetto [mailto:crosetto@att.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 9:37 PM To: ‘ides.debruyne@journalismfund.eu’ <ides.debruyne@journalismfund.eu> Cc: ‘unitedtoendcancer2@gmail.com’ <unitedtoendcancer2@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Need to be connected to an investigative journalist in Europe, WE CANNOT ACCEPT THE CONSEQUENCES OF SUPPRESSING FOR 40 YEARS INVENTIONS TO SAVE LIVES AND TAXPAYER/DONATION MONEY

 

Dear Ides,

 

Thank you for providing the names of two investigative journalists, I contacted both of them.

 

Cecilia Anesi never replied. I contacted her with emails in English on February 24, 2017 at her address info@irpi.eu and on March 13, 2017 with a message in Italian at cecilia.anesi@gmail.com.

 

Hristio Boytchev answered my email. He asked some questions to which I answered and he found them satisfactory. However, yesterday he wrote a message stating “Unfortunately, we don’t have the resources right now that would be necessary to cover your story”  Hristio suggested Philipp Hummel who also stated “this topic doesn’t really fall into my field of work.”

 

Perhaps there is a misconception about the work, expertise and help that millions of taxpayers and cancer patients need from investigative journalists on this case to protect their interests.

 

As I mentioned I am doing all what I can to help taxpayers, cancer patient and humanity for their money not being wasted, their lives not being lost needlessly as it is happening since many years because we have a solution and not being deprived from the benefits from invention, however, I cannot do it alone.

 

They need also the help from you and the investigative journalists when I point out inconsistencies in science, violations to rules and laws, the wasting of hundreds of millions of dollars and the people responsible ignore it. They do not answer, they continue to waste money and lives continue to be lost because I do not have the power to make them accountable. Instead the position of an investigative journalist or agency like yours who can reach and inform many people who are robbed and cheated can exercise more pressure to the people responsible, make them accountable and make a positive change.

 

Perhaps there is a misconception that the investigative journalist need to understand all details of the Level-1 Trigger at CERN, or how Positron Emission Tomography device operates, what is the most cost-efficient way to capture all possible signals from tumor markers, etc. No, the investigative journalist does not need to be more knowledgeable on a specific technical subject than all people at CERN, but rather ask the pertinent question and point out the inconsistencies, contradictions, the violation of laws, rules, etc. For example the journalist who conducted the investication: Ue, 3 miliardi per ricerca sulla sicurezza: molti prototipi, pochi progetti realizzati. “Funzionale all’industria, non ai cittadini” (Italian) – Investigative Reporting Project Italy, 22 February 2017. I don’t’ thing that they knew the details of all projects and had the competence to evaluate the scientific merit of each one, they look at the money that was wasted and who gained advantages: taxpayers or the industry? In this other project 800,000 Euros for a Terror Air Bag that Never Got Made (English) – Zeit Online, 23 February 2017. I doubt that the investigative journalist was the best expert in the world on Air Bags, but he followed the path of the money, what was built and who received advantages.

 

In my case we have some people working at the biggest and most expensive experiment in the history of the planet (over $50 billion) wasting hundreds of millions of dollars, suppressing inventions and depriving taxpayer and humanity from their benefits. We have also an effective technological solution for early cancer detection proven feasible by 59 quotes from reputable industries that can save millions of lives and reduce healthcare cost for the most deadly and costly calamity and it is hard to find an investigative journalist who can follow the path of the money and see who is receiving the advantages, just like the investigations mentioned above?

 

What is effective is the pertinent question to make those who waste money and do not comply with laws and rules accountable. Their answers, their inconsistencies, contradictions and the results from experiments will “judge” them not the knowledge on Air Bags from the super expert investigative journalist.

 

In my case CERN Director General on February 2, 2017, appointed three experts to organize a scientific discussion/review of my invention at CERN. Without your request/pressure on behalf of the taxpayers, it will be unlikely that these three experts will let me present my inventions at CERN because even if they endorsed the value of my inventions in writing, they are in difficulty and want to protect and cover up their colleagues who made mistakes, who continue to make mistakes, continue to receive $4.2 million per year of taxpayer money continue to waste it, suppressing my invention in particle detection.

 

Or another group of people who receive $15.5 million from NIH to build a medical imaging device that is less efficient, cannot save many lives and is over ten times more expensive than my 3D-CBS, early detection device.

 

For example the following could be pertinent questions to the three experts (Butler, Lankford and Pastrone) named by CERN Director General to organize a discussion/review of my invention at CERN: In an official letter (goo.gl/ZJh0Kg) in 1995 Butler wrote: “The 3D-Flow project is the only detailed study demonstrating the feasibility of executing several level-1 trigger algorithms of different experiments… I would like to strongly endorse funding…“ and Lankford in an official letter (goo.gl/8jaxDH) in 1993 wrote: “The ‘3D-Flow’ concept has potential for applications in nearly any future high energy physics experiment.” After providing the 271-page document of my detailed proposal replacing 4,000 electronic boards of the CMS Level-1 Trigger with 9 x 3D-Flow OPRA boards proven feasible by 59 quotes, providing higher performance at 1/1000 the cost of the CMS L-1 Trigger and telling Nadia Pastrone that the coordinator of the CMS Trigger stated he was not interested, on June 3, 2016, during a phone conversation with her, she stated: “You are right, I see your point… before next week I will provide you an answer… It is clear that if what you propose is saving money, I do not see the reason why it should not be examined…, I see your point…, I do not need anything formal, because as you know in this field formality is not important what counts is the substance. Do you agree?” However, after more than nine months I have not received an answer and after nearly two months from her being appointed by the CERN Director General to organize with Butler and Lankford a discussion/review of my inventions at CERN, we are still waiting.

 

The following question to Butler and Lankford would help to initiate a concrete scientific discussion that would make emerge the scientific truth for the benefit of taxpayer and humanity: Would you please provide the reference to any alternative Level-1 Trigger project for which you could make a similar statement today?”

 

Similarly the following question to Nadia Pastrone will lead to the same results: “Because you agree that a project saving money should be examined and what is important in science is the substance, when will you give an opportunity to Crosetto to present his invention at CERN to the scientists who built a less performing and more expensive system and discuss the current and future L-1 Triggers?

 

Or asking to the U.S. Department of Energy why they first promised I could give a presentation of my invention to DOE, than they denied it and destroyed hundreds of pages of my officially submitted proposal… and an investigative journalist could ask several other question that shows them breaking laws, rules, but that I do not have the power to make them accountable because I have not the communication as you have with media that can disseminate these information.

 

I also read several pages of your website www.journalismfund.eu and I admire and applaud what you are doing. Reading your “mission”, “about us” the resume of the people involved it gives me confidence that if I explain clearly which kind of help taxpayers, cancer patients and humanity need from you that I cannot give despite all my effort to help them.

 

Therefore I continue this discussion asking a few question in trying to find an investigative journalist willing to help taxpayers and humanity in this case/cause. I see that you are giving grants to freelance investigative journalist to conduct studies and investigations.

 

Because those contacted so far did not show interest and because this inconsistencies, contradictions that are damaging the public are related to the biggest and most expensive experiment in the history of the planet and to the most deadly and costly calamity, cancer what do you think about sending to entire list of your investigative journalists the five paragraphs after the word “I am requesting” (not me but taxpayers and cancer patients) that I sent you (perhaps with some additional information), hoping to find one or a few interested because this falls into the category of in-depth, cross-border investigation?

 

If the people listed in your advisory board, the Jury, the Board, the Daily Board and the Management believe that this is an important cause worth to support for building a European public debate that would provide a great positive impact to humanity, perhaps you can announce to the entire list of journalists that you have allocated some funds for this project and are calling for submission of proposals to evaluate the best one.

 

Perhaps this will accelerate the transfer of my invention to the bed of the patient, it will avoid repeating another Semmelweis story until my death because the scientific community neither organized a public forum for Semmelweis nor for myself to answer the non-scientific objections of the opponents and by doing this action of finding an investigative journalists interested to this story it will also …let science happen!

 

Looking forward to receive your positive response.

 

Sincerely,

 

Dario Crosetto

 

 

#######################################

From: ides.debruyne@journalismfund.eu [mailto:ides.debruyne@journalismfund.eu] Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 6:35 PM To: Dario Crosetto <crosetto@att.net> Subject: Re: Need to be connected to an investigative journalist in Europe, WE CANNOT ACCEPT THE CONSEQUENCES OF SUPPRESSING FOR 40 YEARS INVENTIONS TO SAVE LIVES AND TAXPAYER/DONATION MONEY

 

Hi Dario,

 

Both are used to push their stories all over Europe. Both can coordinate an international investigation. They did that already in the past. They aren’t focussed on Italy or Germany only.

 

We have funded some of Cecilia her work: http://journalismfund.eu/author/cecilia-anesi

 

Or if you look at this project, then you will see that it’s possible to push it in a lot of countries in Europe.

http://journalismfund.eu/workinggrant/security-sale-price-we-pay-protect-europeans

 

Best,

 

Ides

 

Ides Debruyne Managing Director Journalismfund.eu vzw

 

www.dataharvest.eu / European Investigative Journalism Conference EIJC17 Thursday 18 to Sunday 21 May 2017, Mechelen, Belgium

——————————————————- Journalismfund.eu – “Stimulating in-depth and independent journalism” Rozenweg 4B, B-1731 Zellik (Belgium) T. +32 2 705 59 19 – F. +32 2 705 59 29 – direct +32 2 726 97 88  www.journalismfund.eu – www.fondspascaldecroos.org www.facebook.com/journalismfund @journalismfund – @pascaldecroos – @idesdebruyne PGP https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB1DDC758490B8BD3

 

#####################################

On March 13 at 8:06 am, Dario Crosetto writes to Ides

 

Op 13 mrt. 2017, om 15:06 heeft Dario Crosetto <crosetto@att.net> het volgende geschreven:

 

Hi Ides,

 

Thank you for your information. I have already contacted Cecila Anese and Hristio Boytchev, however this investigation is not limited to Germany or Italy. I will let you know how things progress with Anese and Boytchev, however, if you have an idea who might coordinate the international effort, please let me know.

 

To facilitate your access to information I have provided a few links in the attached page, also available at https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxWfo2ViJ6r5TUY4bHoyeVVZSHc/view?usp=sharing (I will add more links to substantiate my claims and to provide a clearer picture of the situation.

 

Please find the document substantiating the appropriateness of the comparison between Semmelweis and Crosetto in the article below and page above at this link https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxWfo2ViJ6r5c25sYmh1SnJTa00/view?usp=sharing

 

Please find the requests in the PETITION which are not limited to Italy, but are addressed to the European Parliament, Belgium, Germany, England, France, United States, etc. Do you know investigative journalists in all these countries and who would you suggest best for coordinate the investigation and then a single person in each country (in addition to Cecilia Anese in Italy) who could take care to inform about this case in their own country? Link to the PETITION: https://www.change.org/p/cardio-surgeon-who-supports-the-scientific-truth-dr-vincenzo-vigna-stop-suppressing-crosetto-s-lifesaving-technology-we-demand-an-investigation

 

 

I am requesting:

  1. A public scientific review of Crosetto’s new 3D-Flow OPRA invention, similar to the one held at FERMILAB in 1993 for Crosetto’s basic 3D-Flow invention, where he presents his invention at CERN auditorium and has the possibility to publicly answer questions from his opponents. Because the benefits from Crosetto’s inventions in several fields are related to a revolutionary improvement of the tools for particle detection, and because the indisputable most advanced research center in the world in particle detection is CERN, the first review should be conducted at CERN. We are grateful to CERN Director General, Dr Fabiola Gianotti, who gave her blessing on February 3, 2017 to hold this review at CERN, nominating top experts in the field to organize such a discussion, and we hope that her example will be followed by other leaders in the field of medical imaging as well as government agencies in Europe and the U.S. who fund both particle detection and medical imaging. Specifically, the review should address Crosetto’s 271-page proposal proven feasible by 59 quotes from reputable industries showing how 4,000 electronic data processing boards of the CERN CMS Level-1 Trigger can be replaced with only 9 electronic boards of the 3D-Flow OPRA system with much higher performance at one thousandth the cost.  Similarly, the 3D-Flow OPRA system can replace electronics for the Atlas experiment and other physics experiments at a fraction of the cost and provide a much more powerful tool for them to discover new particles.

 

  1. At least two public hearings in Europe and in the U.S. where Crosetto can present his 3D-CBS (3-D Complete Body Screening) invention targeted to early cancer detection, that makes use of the 3D-Flow system and has the highest potential to significantly reduce cancer deaths and costs compared to other approaches.  Scientists who opposed Crosetto’s inventions by rejecting articles, rejecting funding and refused to provide calculations and scientific evidence defending their claims when compared to Crosetto’s claims and calculations should be invited.

 

  1. In Europe the ENVI (Environment, Public Health and Food Safety) European Union Committee in Brussels and/or the STOA(Science and Technology Options Assessment) under the “Thematic priority area: Health and new technologies in the life sciences”, need to organize such a hearing inviting experts from European countries who spend the most money on fighting cancer (Italy, France, Germany, etc.). The audio, video and documentation of this hearing translated into 24 languages and posted as usual on the European Union website, will inform the European community. This will help accelerate the transfer the benefits of Crosetto’s inventions to the bed of the patient.

 

  1. In the United States, the Department of Energy (DOE), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the Cancer Moonshot Project, and the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRITNelson) need to organize a combined hearing inviting their experts in particle detection and medical imaging who opposed Crosetto’s inventions, rejected his articles and his requests for funding, and in particular those who received $15.5 million funding from NCI to build the Explorerdevice which is less efficient and ten times more expensive than the 3D-CBS. It would be appropriate to organize this combined hearing at DOE, or separate hearings starting with the DOE followed by the others. (Dr. Jim Siegrist, Director of the Office of High Energy Physics of DOE already promised Crosetto in emails and phone conversations in the summer 2015 to hold a presentation at DOE).

 

At all these public reviews and hearings that would follow scientific procedures of Crosetto’s 3D-Flow and 3D-CBS inventions, it is of utmost importance that Dr. Stefan Ritt, President of IEEE-NPSS, the world’s largest technical professional organization with over 400,000 members dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity would attend or person(s) appointed by him. On November 5, 2016, at the IEEE-NSS-MIC-RTSD Conference in Strasbourg, France, Crosetto had a meeting lasting almost two hours with Dr. Ritt and the previous IEEE-NPSS President, John Verboncoeur, where they could not point out flaws with Crosetto’s inventions and where they stated they had never heard of anything like his inventions before.

 

 

###########################################

From: ides.debruyne@fondspascaldecroos.org [mailto:ides.debruyne@fondspascaldecroos.org]  Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 7:45 AM To: Dario Crosetto <crosetto@att.net> Subject: Re: Please find one page summary of my situation FW: Need to be connected to an investigative journalist in Europe

 

Hi Dario,

 

I would suggest to contact the IRPI people. They are Italian but think European. This is their website: https://irpi.eu

 

You can contact them with my regards. This is the email of Cecilia Anesi: cecilia.anesi@gmail.com

 

An alternative is the German Correct!v https://correctiv.org

Phone: +49 30 555 780 20

Hristio Boytchev is the guy you need:  hristio.boytchev@correctiv.org

 

Best,

 

Ides

 

Ides Debruyne Managing Director Journalismfund.eu vzw

 

www.dataharvest.eu / European Investigative Journalism Conference EIJC17

Thursday 18 to Sunday 21 May 2017, Mechelen, Belgium ——————————————————- Journalismfund.eu – “Stimulating in-depth and independent journalism” Rozenweg 4B, B-1731 Zellik (Belgium) T. +32 2 705 59 19 – F. +32 2 705 59 29 – direct +32 2 726 97 88  www.journalismfund.eu – www.fondspascaldecroos.org www.facebook.com/journalismfund @journalismfund – @pascaldecroos – @idesdebruyne PGP https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB1DDC758490B8BD3

 

#######################################

On March 10, 2017 at 9:13 am Dario Crosetto writes to Ides

 

Op 10 mrt. 2017, om 16:13 heeft Dario Crosetto <crosetto@att.net> het volgende geschreven:

 

Dear Ides,

 

Please find attached one page summary of my situation.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Dario Crosetto

 

##############################################

On February 24, 2017 at 6:06 am Dario Crosetto writes to Ides

 

From: Dario Crosetto [mailto:crosetto@att.net]  Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 6:06 AM To: ‘ides.debruyne@fondspascaldecroos.org’ <ides.debruyne@fondspascaldecroos.org> Subject: Need to be connected to an investigative journalist in Europe

 

 

Dear Ides,

 

Bianca Lemmens provided your email address as a contact who could help provide the names of investigative journalists in Europe.

 

I appreciate if you could provide the names of a few investigative journalists who could consider taking the case described in the following petition. I live in Dallas, Texas since 1991, my phone number is:  +001-972-223-2904.

 

See the description of the case at:

 

https://www.change.org/p/cardio-surgeon-who-supports-the-scientific-truth-dr-vincenzo-vigna-stop-suppressing-crosetto-s-lifesaving-technology-we-demand-an-investigation

 

looking forward to your reply.

Kind Regards,

 

Dario Crosetto

Share it!Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on TumblrEmail this to someone

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Site Overview
Please visit our
Site Overview for help in navigating the site.
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Upcoming Events
October 2017
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
September 25, 2017 September 26, 2017 September 27, 2017 September 28, 2017 September 29, 2017 September 30, 2017 October 1, 2017
October 2, 2017 October 3, 2017 October 4, 2017 October 5, 2017 October 6, 2017 October 7, 2017 October 8, 2017
October 9, 2017 October 10, 2017 October 11, 2017 October 12, 2017 October 13, 2017 October 14, 2017 October 15, 2017
October 16, 2017 October 17, 2017 October 18, 2017 October 19, 2017 October 20, 2017 October 21, 2017 October 22, 2017
October 23, 2017 October 24, 2017 October 25, 2017 October 26, 2017 October 27, 2017 October 28, 2017 October 29, 2017
October 30, 2017 October 31, 2017 November 1, 2017 November 2, 2017 November 3, 2017 November 4, 2017 November 5, 2017
Recent Comments