The Future is in Our Hands
Blog
Information, Awareness, Prevention / United to End Cancer

This document is available in pdf at: goo.gl/hnPCeK

I have invented a revolutionary electronic technology-independent architecture/instrument proven feasible by 59 quotes from reputable industries to build using 2015 technology a 3D-Flow OPRA (Object Pattern real-time Recognition Algorithms) system with 8,192 channels, in 36 cm (15 inch) cube of electronics capable of sustaining over 1.3TB/sec input data rate, and execute with zero dead-time on the input data, complex programmable real-time Object Pattern Recognition Algorithms (OPRA) at a production cost of approximately $100,000. In the same volume of 36 cm cube of electronics, it is feasible to build a 3D-Flow OPRA system with 20,000 channels capable of sustaining over 20TB/sec input data rate. Larger systems can be built by linking several similar cubes of electronics.

From: United To End Cancer [mailto:volunteers@u2ec.org]

Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 3:29 PM

To: ‘president@mit.edu’ <president@mit.edu>; ‘reif@mit.edu’ <reif@mit.edu> Cc: ‘unitedtoendcancer@att.net’ <unitedtoendcancer@att.net>; ‘unitedtoendcancer2@gmail.com’ <unitedtoendcancer2@gmail.com>

Subject: I am looking forward to receiving a prompt response setting a date and time convenient to you to discuss this matter or please provide the names of people experts in electronics who can compare my 3D-Flow OPRA system with other systems that they know

 

Dear Prof. Rafael Reif, President of MIT,

 

Last week I call on the phone your office explaining the matter of my invention and the request I receive from many people, including taxpayers and cancer patients who trust MIT reputation to present and discuss my inventions with experts at MIT. The staff at your office asked me to submit a short description and request to your attention assuring that I will receive a response.

 

Please find below a summary of my inventions and references to a two page description, to a 45-page peer review article and to a 271-page detailed description of each component of my 3D-Flow OPRA system.

 

I have invented a revolutionary electronic technology-independent architecture/instrument proven feasible by 59 quotes from reputable industries to build using 2015 technology a 3D-Flow OPRA (Object Pattern real-time Recognition Algorithms) system with 8,192 channels, in 36 cm (15 inch) cube of electronics capable of sustaining over 1.3TB/sec input data rate, and execute with zero dead-time on the input data, complex programmable real-time Object Pattern Recognition Algorithms (OPRA) at a production cost of approximately $100,000. In the same volume of 36 cm cube of electronics, it is feasible to build a 3D-Flow OPRA system with 20,000 channels capable of sustaining over 20TB/sec input data rate. Larger systems can be built by linking several similar cubes of electronics.

 

It can provide disruptive advantages in several applications in making computers more capable overcoming since 1992 the limits of Moore’s laws that is now dead (e.g. (a) extracting all valuable information from radiation to identify rare particles from ultra-high data rate that cannot be stored on hard drives because in one day will fill all hard drives of the planet, (b) extracting all valuable information from radiation to identify all valuable signals related to tumor markers for an effective early cancer detection requiring a very-low radiation to the patient, in industrial quality control, etc.).

 

My basic 3D-Flow parallel-processing architecture, summarized in one page at ‘goo.gl/NQ8Cck’, recognized valuable by academia, industry and research centers at a major official, formal, international scientific review, held at Fermilab in 1993 (goo.gl/zP76Tc), proven feasible and functional in FPGA hardware, when in synergy with the implementation in its different parts using 2015 technology is summarized in two pages at ‘goo.gl/AoszvQ’ and detailed at ‘goo.gl/w3XlZ1’. The combination of these two elements provided the inventive step of the new 3D-Flow OPRA technology with unprecedented advantages.

 

My 3D-Flow invention could have replaced hundreds of crates containing 4,000 electronic boards of CERN CMS L-1 Trigger Experiment at a fraction of the cost, while providing more performance as reported on pages 102-117 of ‘goo.gl/w3XlZ1’, and could have replaced the trigger at many other experiments at CERN. For example: a) in 1994 with a cylinder of electronics 1.8m tall x 1m in diameter, b) in 1999 with 6 x 9U VME crates as described in the 45-page peer-reviewed article published by Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Sec. A, vol. 436, (1999) pp.341-385. Using 2015 technology can hundreds of crates of electronics (goo.gl/mPHw5Y) containing 4,000 electronic boards with one crate containing 9 of my 3D-Flow OPRA boards, while providing higher performance at one thousandth the cost. (summarized in two pages at goo.gl/AoszvQ detailed at goo.gl/w3XlZ1).

 

These claims can be proven analytically and ultimately by experimental results showing which system can find more sought particles within real LHC data at a very high luminosity in a controlled environment where it is known how many sought particles are memorized in the ER/DSU unit, will prove which system is the best.

 

The ER/DSU unit (Event Recorder Detector Simulation Unit described on pages 8, 12, 23, 32, 149-170 of ‘goo.gl/w3XlZ1) costing only $40,000 would be able to record raw data from the LHC (Large Hadron Collider) apparatus and then replay the same data to the 3D-Flow OPRA system and to the CMS Level-1 Trigger (or other trigger system) proving their enormous difference in efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

 

When the 3D-Flow OPRA invention is used in the 3D-CBS (3-D Complete Body Screening) technology, it makes it hundreds of times more efficient than the over 10,000 PET (Positron Emission Tomography) devices used in hospitals providing for the first time a true paradigm change in molecular imaging.

(See the 2000 book: “400+ times improved PET efficiency for lower-dose radiation, lower-cost cancer screening at ‘goo.gl/ggGGwF’, see trifold at “goo.gl/YcAJDy“, more details at “goo.gl/JMKyek“, the five-page 2003 article at ‘goo.gl/RiIn0B’, the 32-page 2013 article at “goo.gl/qpnNxd”, one-page innovations at “goo.gl/3AFCWM”, one-page benefits at ‘goo.gl/Zx1p9Q’, two-page 2016 summary and comparison with the Explorer at: ‘goo.gl/QLuA1n’ and the source information from the authors of the “Explorer Project” at ‘goo.gl/Tl95NN’ or at ‘goo.gl/ovMZ5j’, which was funded by NIH for $15.5 million although less efficient, incapable of saving many lives and more than ten times expensive as the 3D-CBS).

 

Taxpayers, cancer patients, investors, etc. and people who would like to receive the benefits of my inventions, but are not knowledgeable in the field are asking me to present and discuss my inventions with experts in electronics like you and are asking if you can compare my 3D-Flow OPRA system that breaks the speed barrier in real-time application with any system that you might know and provide the references.

 

I am looking forward receiving a prompt response setting a date and time convenient to you to discuss this matter or please provide the names of people experts in electronics who can compare my 3D-Flow OPRA system with the systems that they know to assess the advantages of one with respect to the other.

 

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Dario Crosetto

President of the Crosetto Foundation for the Reduction of Cancer Deaths

900 Hideaway Pl.

DeSoto, TX, 75115 – Email: crosettodario@gmail.com

 

From: United To End Cancer [mailto:volunteers@u2ec.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 10:01 AM To: ‘epatton@mit.edu’ <epatton@mit.edu> Cc: ‘unitedtoendcancer@att.net’ <unitedtoendcancer@att.net> Subject: FW: I am looking forward to receiving a prompt response setting a date and time convenient to you to discuss this matter or please provide the names of people experts in electronics who can compare my 3D-Flow OPRA system with other systems that they know

 

Dear Ms. Patton,

 

Thank you for reassuring yesterday on the phone that my email was received and that soon I will receive a written response from MIT President Prof. Reif.

I appreciate if you would keep me informed when I should expect the response.

 

Thank you,

Kind Regards,

Dario Crosetto

Share it!Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on TumblrEmail this to someone

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Site Overview
Please visit our
Site Overview for help in navigating the site.
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Upcoming Events
October 2017
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
September 25, 2017 September 26, 2017 September 27, 2017 September 28, 2017 September 29, 2017 September 30, 2017 October 1, 2017
October 2, 2017 October 3, 2017 October 4, 2017 October 5, 2017 October 6, 2017 October 7, 2017 October 8, 2017
October 9, 2017 October 10, 2017 October 11, 2017 October 12, 2017 October 13, 2017 October 14, 2017 October 15, 2017
October 16, 2017 October 17, 2017 October 18, 2017 October 19, 2017 October 20, 2017 October 21, 2017 October 22, 2017
October 23, 2017 October 24, 2017 October 25, 2017 October 26, 2017 October 27, 2017 October 28, 2017 October 29, 2017
October 30, 2017 October 31, 2017 November 1, 2017 November 2, 2017 November 3, 2017 November 4, 2017 November 5, 2017
Recent Comments