Facts and figures in the article prove that there are no technical or economic reasons to prevent the defeat of cancer and to reduce the cost of experiments in High Energy Physics
Sunday, October 22, 2017’s article published in the Focus Daily News and distributed next day to thousands of scientists at the most important conference in the world in instrumentation for physics and medical imaging held from October 23 to 28, 2017 in Atlanta, Georgia.
The four-page article is available in pdf at: goo.gl/EJD9yU and in HTML at http://blog.u2ec.org/wordpress/?p=2156
Facts and figures in the article prove that there are no technical or economic reasons to prevent the defeat of cancer and to reduce the cost of experiments in High Energy Physics while enormously increasing the performance with my inventions.
I received from Paul Lecoq, a senior scientists working in Medical Imaging a comment similar to the senior scientist and leader at GE that there is nothing new in the Explorer PET project funded with $15.5 million from NIH, just more of everything, and that it could never become a commercial product because is too expensive. He also commented: “Do you see that after many years people (Explorer) are going into your direction of a PET with a long field of view? However, I added, that the benefits could have been realized from a simulation or even just from calculations on the back of an envelope and now it is inconsistent to fund the Explorer less efficient and ten times more expensive than the 3D-CBS.
After distributing the four-page article for about two hours from 7:50 am, a staff member told me that Deputy Chairman of the Conference, Ralf Engels did not want me to distribute the article. I asked him the reason in writing so I could forward it to all of you and he stated that this should come from the U.S. IEEE headquarter in New Jersey.
We agreed with the General Chairman of the Conference John Aarsvold that I could distribute until this written order from the U.S. IEEE headquarter would be received. The reason and order to stop distribution never arrived and I continued.
During the poster session, I had over half hour very cordial conversation with IEEE General Chairman of the Conference, John Aarsvold who told me about several injustices he went through, e.g. a proposal that was rejected from goofy reviewers, another proposal submitted for 5 years to NIH that was never funded although he could prove to be beneficial.
Sometimes he said decisions are taken from powerful people and we should just accept them and do something else as he did.
However, we saw eye to eye in many things during our conversation, e.g. the role of a scientists, what is right and what is wrong for a scientist… The most important thing was his statement recognizing that it was clear that to make the scientific truth emerge there should be a forum/review of my inventions where I should have the opportunity to answer the objections from those who oppose my inventions (This is nothing different from the public scientific review that was held at Fermilab on my invention in 1993 that was recognized valuable).
He gave me hopes that he would think how this could happen. I hope that no one will be discouraged to make the scientific truth emerge and prevail for the benefit of humanity because powerful people do not want it.
I bumped several times in the halls with IEEE NPSS President Stefan Ritt asking him to find a moment to talk about the scientific aspect of my inventions that he state that never heard anything similar before our two hours conversation last year at the same conference in Strasbourg, in France. However, he does not want to address it.
I reminded that I need to ask him to address it because of his position of responsibility. It would be helpful if someone of you would ask him the same thing (email: firstname.lastname@example.org)
On Monday, October 23, 2017 at 5:30 pm, I attended the presentation by T. Orimoto on behalf of the CERN-CMS collaboration “High precision electromagnetic calorimetry with 40 MHz readout: the CMS crystal ECAL for the High-Luminosity LHC.”
I asked her if their project was executing the entire Level-1 Trigger algorithm on each of the 75,000 detector elements and she said it is under evaluation.
There is an official report from a formal, public, international scientific review held at Fermilab on December 1993 stating that my 3D-Flow invention has the capability to do it on each detector element.
It would be appropriate to let me present my invention and answer possible objections, rather than building 4,000 electronic boards as it was done in the previous CMS Level-1 Trigger and then trash them in February 26, 2016 because it did not work.
List of the people to whom was sent this message:
‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ’email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘Jonathan.Ungoed-Thomas@Sunday-Times.co.uk’ <Jonathan.Ungoed-Thomas@Sunday-Times.co.uk>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘Sen. Jane Nelson’ <Jane.Nelson@senate.texas.gov>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘Mark.HUNTER@insead.edu’ <Mark.HUNTER@insead.edu>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘Collinsf@od.nih.gov’ <Collinsf@od.nih.gov>; ‘Michael.Lauer@nih.gov’ <Michael.Lauer@nih.gov>; ‘LowyD@mail.nih.gov’ <LowyD@mail.nih.gov>; ‘Michael.L.Corbat@citi.com’ <Michael.L.Corbat@citi.com>; ‘James.A.Forese@citi.com’ <James.A.Forese@citi.com>; ‘Alberto.J.Verme@citi.com’ <Alberto.J.Verme@citi.com>; ‘Jane.Fraser@citi.com’ <Jane.Fraser@citi.com>; ‘John.C.Gerspach@citi.com’ <John.C.Gerspach@citi.com>; ‘Deepak.Sharma@citi.com’ <Deepak.Sharma@citi.com>; ‘Stephen.Volk@citi.com’ <Stephen.Volk@citi.com>; ‘Paco.Ybarra@citi.com’ <Paco.Ybarra@citi.com>; ‘Stephen.Bird@citi.com’ <Stephen.Bird@citi.com>; ‘Don.Callahan@citi.com’ <Don.Callahan@citi.com>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘President@rockfound.org’ <President@rockfound.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘Roger.Carr@bbc.co.uk’ <Roger.Carr@bbc.co.uk>; ‘Richard.Ayre@bbc.co.uk’ <Richard.Ayre@bbc.co.uk>; ‘Aideen.McGinley@bbc.co.uk’ <Aideen.McGinley@bbc.co.uk>; ‘Tim.Davie@bbc.co.uk’ <Tim.Davie@bbc.co.uk>; ‘Nora Wehofsits’ <email@example.com>; ‘Jane Whyatt | ECPMF’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>; ‘email@example.com’ <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Facts and figures in the article prove that there are no technical or economic reasons to prevent the defeat of cancer and to reduce the cost of experiments in High Energy Physics