Dear Ms. Brazile, Thank you for your email. During the past months I am receiving an average of eight emails per day from you, President Obama, his wife, Vice-President Joe Biden or others from DNC. I am respectful to you and the people you represent that you are able to express your ideas sending millions of emails more than eight times a day. I am respectful to people who express and send ideas opposite to yours such as “Free Bacon” and others or to the New York Times for informing us about the More Than 150 Republican Leaders Don’t Support Donald Trump, comforting us with an example that shows a world of REASON in a civil country is more important than a party line. Continue reading
Dear Vice-President Joe Biden, Thank you for your email. During the past months I am receiving an average of eight emails per day from you, President Obama, his wife, Donna Brazile or others from DNC. I am respectful to you and the people you represent that you are able to express your ideas sending millions of emails more than eight times a day. I am respectful to people who express and send ideas opposite to yours such as “Free Bacon” and others or to the New York Times for informing us about the More Than 150 Republican Leaders Don’t Support Donald Trump, comforting us with an example that shows a world of REASON in a civil country is more important than a party line. (just from Mr. Biden, I received four email in nine hours from Saturday 10/22 at 3:54 pm, 10:28 pm, Sunday 10/23 at 12:05 am, 12:17 am). Continue reading
DOE email reveals procedure to assign taxpayer money to research projects is corrupt. This corruption and other inconsistencies when assigning taxpayer and donation money to research projects is not limited to DOE but is common in other organizations and is detrimental to us all. Please take action to help reform the current anonymous peer-review system conducted among a circle of friends of scientists meeting behind closed doors to split taxpayer and donation money without addressing technical issues/arguments in a public meeting with ethical scientists and applicants, which would reveal the advantages/benefits of a project/idea/invention compared to others.
Summary: 160,007,400 people have died from cancer (one every 4 seconds) since Crosetto’s invention was crushed. It is a crime to deny an analytical scientific discussion that would prevent the loss of millions of deaths and trillions of dollars. Continue reading
President Obama, Thank you for your letter dated August 3, 2016. I am looking forward to your support and the support of other leaders and journalists to provide visibility and to unveil Crawford’s attempt to use the excuse of blaming others of harassment in order not to do his job and to cover up corruption among scientists. Continue reading
Dear President Obama, Vice-President Joe Biden, leaders, professionals, journalists and to the attention of anyone who has a role in serving science, the public interest, and who is dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity, 159,856,200 people have died from cancer since my invention which could have saved over 50% of their lives was crushed (11,835,200 were Americans). Hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayer money has been wasted building less efficient and more costly projects knowing that my invention can provide staggering performance improvements at a fraction of the cost. Continue reading
Dear Dr. Alexander Morris, Director of FOIA (Freedom of Information Act),
- I would like to respectfully request the name of the person(s) who gave this order to diverge all my emails addressed to DOE employees/offices to DOE Security.
- I would also like to request you provide all the records (both internal communication between DOE employees and communication between DOE employees and external people) that mention a) my name, b) United to End Cancer, c) my application #0000222704, d) the 3D-Flow OPRA (Object Pattern Recognition Algorithm), e) the 3D-CBS, f) the evaluations of my proposal, g) Crawford’s reasons why in his opinion (or his reviewers’ opinions) my proposal is not sound and feasible or any evaluation they might have made.
Why is taxpayer money being wasted by funding less efficient and more expensive projects (1000 times more expensive) and medical equipment that does not save lives, while my 3D-Flow OPRA and 3D-CBS inventions supported by 59 quotes from reputable industries could have saved and still can save taxpayer money and millions of lives but is not addressed analytically, based on calculations and scientific evidence in a PUBLIC scientific review as was my previous invention at FERMILAB by a major scientific review panel? Continue reading
I would like to report documents and facts to leaders and journalists who serve the public interest which show Crawford’s actions violating government rules and abusing his power, and request that his supervisors fix the inconsistencies. He has referred to and applied a non-existent rule to deny my legitimate request for his service, and was complicit in the cover up of corrupt scientists who sought grants from DOE without following a fair scientific procedure and who want to continue splitting taxpayer money among themselves behind closed doors. Continue reading
Are any of the IEEE leaders in favor of an OPEN, PUBLIC workshop where young and senior scientists may express the analytical thinking of their ideas and can question each other on calculations and scientific evidence? And would IEEE leaders agree to ask these same questions to their 400,000 IEEE members? Continue reading